← Research & Writing CopilotCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Research & Writing Copilot

Snapshot Nov 3, 2026 · 18:48 UTC · version 0.2.0

Collection source: downloaded plugin package.

WHAT CHANGED

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Save Research & Writing Copilot and check future changes in Following.

Up to 10 plugins free · no card required.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Perform pre-publication QA of research, citations, technical correctness, clarity, copyright and formatting with explicit release blockers.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "review-publication",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: review-publication\ndescription: Perform pre-publication QA of research, citations, technical correctness, clarity, copyright and formatting with explicit release blockers.\n---\n\n# Review Publication\n\n**Shared standards.** Preserve the user's purpose and existing material; never fabricate evidence, URLs, quotations, citations, first-person experiences, interviews, tool runs or publication. Distinguish sourced observations from independent reproduction and analysis. Use actual host research/files/code tools when available; disclose unavailable verification. For current facts, verify fresh authoritative sources. Ask only when an essential constraint prevents useful work.\n\n## Procedure\n1. Inspect the actual final copy and supporting evidence. Separate required facts from optional style improvements.\n2. Check source support, version/date scope, quote attribution, DOI/URL accuracy, unsupported statistics and personal-experience claims.\n3. Check technical examples for correctness and real execution evidence; treat unrun commands as unverified.\n4. Check structure, accessibility of visuals, link health, originality, tone and target-publication guidelines.\n5. Classify findings blocking, important, optional. 'Ready' is allowed only when material blockers are resolved or transparently accepted by the user where appropriate.\n6. Record actual check status: passed / failed / not run. Do not turn 'not run' into 'passed'.\n## Deliver\nEditorial verdict, ordered findings tied to actual passages, suggested fixes and remaining limitations.\n\n## Related references\n- Read `../../references/publication-qa.md` when it materially informs this task.\n- Read `../../references/evidence-policy.md` when it materially informs this task.\n- Read `../../references/fact-check-and-edit.md` when it materially informs this task.\n"
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: 8004f52b85b5b2f94fe908bc6bfa25f15dfa8a93a70a5fbf8a85b259d19bd01b