Update to Research & Writing Copilot

{
  "description": "Compare software, services, frameworks or architectures against explicit requirements using normalized and current evidence.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "technology-comparison",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: technology-comparison\ndescription: Compare software, services, frameworks or architectures against explicit requirements using normalized and current evidence.\n---\n\n# Technology Comparison\n\n**Shared standards.** Preserve the user's purpose and existing material; never fabricate evidence, URLs, quotations, citations, first-person experiences, interviews, tool runs or publication. Distinguish sourced observations from independent reproduction and analysis. Use actual host research/files/code tools when available; disclose unavailable verification. For current facts, verify fresh authoritative sources. Ask only when an essential constraint prevents useful work.\n\n## Procedure\n1. Translate the user's request into a decision context: workloads, scale, security, ops constraints, platform, budget and team experience.\n2. Choose discriminating criteria, not a generic 20-row checklist. Confirm exact versions, plans, deployment models, geographic scope, benchmarks and prices.\n3. Distinguish documented capabilities, vendor-reported claims, independently reproduced results and user-reported experience.\n4. Analyze operational trade-offs, integration risk, migration cost, ecosystem and lock-in where relevant.\n5. Recommend only when requirements and evidence warrant it. State what would make the alternative preferable.\n## Deliver\nDecision framing, concise criteria table, evidence-backed analysis, recommendation with reversal conditions, gaps and source links. No imaginary benchmark numbers.\n\n## Related references\n- Read `../../references/comparison-criteria.md` when it materially informs this task.\n- Read `../../references/evidence-policy.md` when it materially informs this task.\n"
}