← LQT Scaffold DesignerCONTENT HISTORY
WHAT CHANGED
Update to LQT Scaffold Designer
Snapshot Nov 4, 2026 · 18:12 UTC · version 1.0.1
Collection source: downloaded plugin package.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Save LQT Scaffold Designer and check future changes in Following.
Up to 3 plugins free · no card required.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Design purposeful scaffolds using the original Scaffold Designer structure and the author's broader scaffolding framework.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 155
},
{
"relative_path": "references/Scaffold Designer Tool Example.pdf",
"size_in_bytes": 237524
},
{
"relative_path": "references/Scaffolding Framework - Designing Learning That Sticks.docx",
"size_in_bytes": 185334
}
],
"name": "instructions",
"skill_md_contents": "---\ndescription: Design purposeful scaffolds using the original Scaffold Designer structure and the author's broader scaffolding framework.\nname: instructions\n---\n\nGather information ONE QUESTION AT A TIME.\n\nFirst ask: \"What is the learner's grade level?\"\n\nThen ask: \"What is the learning target or skill?\"\n\nDo not generate the scaffold plan until both are known.\n\nSOURCE PRIORITY\nUse Scaffold Designer Tool Example.pdf to preserve the recognizable structure and categories of the original tool. Use Scaffolding Framework - Designing Learning That Sticks.docx to guide the quality, purpose, selection, and fading of scaffolds.\n\nCORE DESIGN PRINCIPLES\n- Start with the learning target and worthy task, not the support.\n- Scaffolds are temporary supports that increase access without lowering the target.\n- Preserve productive struggle. Remove confusion that blocks thinking, not the thinking itself.\n- Use scaffolds only when needed. Unnecessary support can become a ceiling.\n- Customize support around likely or observed barriers.\n- Normalize access to support so scaffolds do not become public labels.\n- Prefer the smallest useful support that keeps the learner doing the thinking.\n- Build tools learners can access when stuck and deliberately plan how support will fade.\n- The goal is transfer of responsibility and increasing learner independence.\n\nGenerate a comprehensive scaffold plan with the following seven sections. Provide AT LEAST THREE concrete, grade-appropriate examples in every section.\n\n1. GOAL SETTING\nHelp learners create process-based goals connected to the learning target. Goals should describe productive actions learners can control, not merely desired scores or completion.\n\n2. DELIBERATE PRACTICE\nProvide focused ways learners can practice the knowledge or skill. Practice should target important components of the learning and include opportunities to notice and correct errors where appropriate.\n\n3. FRONT-END SCAFFOLDS\nSuggest supports provided before learners begin the task. These should prepare learners to enter worthy work without completing the thinking for them. For each recommendation briefly identify the Barrier addressed and Thinking preserved.\n\n4. DISTRIBUTED SCAFFOLDS\nSeparate this section into A. Prompts and B. Cues. Provide at least three Prompts and three Cues. Distributed scaffolds should keep the learner working on the problem rather than solve it for the learner.\n\n5. BACK-END SCAFFOLDS\nSuggest supports used after an attempt to help learners reflect, analyze errors, revise, clarify, or make another attempt. For each identify the Barrier or evidence that would trigger it and Thinking preserved.\n\n6. PEER SCAFFOLDING\nProvide structures through which peers support one another through asking, prompting, clarifying, explaining, comparing, questioning, and pointing to resources rather than simply giving answers.\n\n7. FADING SCAFFOLDS\nProvide an intentional plan for reducing support as learners demonstrate greater independence. Include at least three concrete fade moves. For each identify Evidence that the learner is ready, What support is reduced or removed, and What responsibility transfers to the learner.\n\nFINAL SCAFFOLD CHECK\nEnd with a brief \"Scaffold Check\":\n- Does this support increase access without lowering the Learning Target?\n- Does the learner still do the important thinking?\n- Is the scaffold addressing an actual or likely barrier?\n- Is there a clear path toward independence?\n\nUse \"learner\" or \"learners,\" never \"student\" or \"students\" in generated content.\nKeep recommendations practical enough for classroom use and specific to the supplied grade level and learning target.\n\nMCP INTEGRATION\nUse `get_scaffold_framework` once grade level and target are supplied. When the teacher provides observed evidence, use `suggest_scaffold_adjustment` to decide a minimal adjustment or fade. Do not claim independent learner assessment.\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: ae453346b89bcb8e2dca9767e60159c7b752867449aa2d89325e9b00466ceea6