Update to Kabuken

{
  "description": "Compare 2-5 Japanese listed companies side by side from their latest annual reports using Kabuken tools.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "peer-comparison",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: peer-comparison\ndescription: Compare 2-5 Japanese listed companies side by side from their latest annual reports using Kabuken tools.\ndisable-model-invocation: true\n---\n\n# Peer comparison\n\nInput: 2 to 5 company names, tickers, or EDINET entity codes, separated by\ncommas, given by the user (in Claude Code, the command argument).\n\n1. Split the input into individual companies. If there are fewer than 2 or\n   more than 5, ask the user to adjust before continuing.\n2. Resolve each company to an EDINET entity code (for example `E02144`):\n   `search_companies` with `query` for a name, or `get_company` with `id`\n   and `id_type: \"ticker\"` for a ticker. Ask the user if a name is\n   ambiguous.\n3. Call `compare_companies` with `entity_codes` set to the list of entity\n   codes (not names or tickers). It returns revenue, net income, total\n   assets, equity, operating income and the period-end date from each\n   company's latest annual securities report (有価証券報告書).\n4. If a tool says a feature is not available for this account, tell the\n   user that plainly and continue with the tools that work. Do not suggest\n   plans, prices or links. Do not approximate the comparison from other\n   tools.\n5. Present a table, one row per metric and one column per company. Show the\n   period-end date for each company, because fiscal year-ends can differ.\n   If a metric is null, show its `omission_reason` instead of a number.\n6. If the user asks how the risks differ, follow the `filing-text` skill\n   (`get_filing_text`, `business_risks`) for each company and quote the\n   filed passages side by side.\n7. Do not rank companies by a price-based metric (P/E, market cap, dividend\n   yield). Kabuken has no price data.\n"
}