Update to Vaquill AI Primary Law

{
  "description": "Verify every legal citation in a file, selection, or pasted text against the official source text. Subject: [file path, or paste the text].",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "verify-citations",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: verify-citations\ndescription: Verify every legal citation in a file, selection, or pasted text against the official source text. Subject: [file path, or paste the text].\n---\n\nVerify the citations in whichever subject the conversation is about. If it is not clear from the conversation, ask for it before calling anything.\n\nIf no argument was given, use the current selection or ask which file to check.\n\nProcedure:\n\n1. Extract every statutory, regulatory and court-rule citation from the text. Ignore case citations; this corpus does not carry general case law, and say so if the text leans on them.\n2. Resolve them in one call with `resolve_statute_citations_batch` rather than one at a time. It is priced per citation either way, so the batch is a pure round-trip win.\n3. For each citation that resolved, fetch the section metadata and check `goodLawStatus`.\n4. For any citation whose quoted language matters to the argument, fetch the body and compare the quotation against the official text verbatim.\n\nReport as a table: citation as written, what it resolved to, whether it is still good law, and whether any quoted language matches.\n\nFlag these separately and prominently:\n\n- Citations that did not resolve. Say \"did not resolve\" rather than \"does not exist\"; an unresolved citation may be a formatting variant.\n- Citations pointing at repealed or superseded provisions.\n- Quotations that differ from the official text, with both versions shown.\n\nDo not silently correct a citation. Show what was written and what the source says, and let the user decide.\n"
}