Update to Lucia

{
  "description": "Review a selected collection of legal documents against common questions, with one row per document and evidence-backed cells, coverage gaps and an Excel review table. Use for structured document review or due diligence across files.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "references/colonne-italiane.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 1923
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/upstream/LICENSE",
      "size_in_bytes": 1061
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/upstream/PROVENANCE.json",
      "size_in_bytes": 1304
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/upstream/commercial-columns.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 4826
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/upstream/nda-columns.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 3344
    }
  ],
  "name": "revisione-documentale",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: revisione-documentale\ndescription: Review a selected collection of legal documents against common questions, with one row per document and evidence-backed cells, coverage gaps and an Excel review table. Use for structured document review or due diligence across files.\n---\n## Task reporting and recovery\n\nFollow `skills/lucia/references/workflow-usage.md` from this installation root.\nUse the bundled CLI, retaining one task UUID for the primary mandate and retries.\nBuild and show the actual model-data report after the useful result. Missing\nreporting, identity verification or receipt delivery stays an explicit separate\nissue and never blocks the document work. Never fabricate measurements or signatures.\n\n\n\n# Revisione documentale\n\nRead `../revisione-contratti/references/document-workflow.md` and\n`../revisione-contratti/references/prassi-italiana.md` before execution.\nAll helpers run on selected files; no upload to Mike, Dario, Mparanza or a separate\nmodel service. The host model performs the legal reading in the conversation.\n\nAgree the decision and select useful columns from the brief and the documents.\nUse `references/colonne-italiane.md` to select questions for Italian practice.\nChoose them semantically; remove irrelevant questions and add case-specific ones.\nRecord a different relationship, law or formation history in each affected document\ncell when reviewing a mixed portfolio. Upstream YAML snapshots are attribution and\nhistory, not the column definitions to execute. Never fill a missing contract value\nwith a speculative estimate; a requested calculation needs inputs and assumptions.\n\nCreate one source per document and keep amendments and annexes separately\nidentifiable. Explain relationships in the review rather than merging contradictory\ntexts. Process bounded batches, persist review progress and inspect every selected\ndocument. Read long documents in chunks; never silently clip to a character limit.\nTrack actual anchors read in `coverage`. An unreadable or unfinished row remains\nvisible and cannot become “not stated”.\n\nFor each cell separate extracted term, exact quotation, interpretation and action.\nDo not infer agreement-wide silence from a search miss. Read definitions, exceptions\nand applicable schedules before deciding what a term means. Reconcile apparent\ninconsistencies across documents; retain unresolved conflicts explicitly.\n\nRender the common evidence report and Excel table. Summarize exceptional terms,\nmissing information and decisions for the lawyer, without hiding unreviewed rows.\nThe output is a review workpaper, not completed due diligence or legal clearance.\nNo files are sent, filed or changed by this workflow.\n\nUpstream pin and licence: `references/upstream/PROVENANCE.json` and `LICENSE`.\n"
}