Update to Lucia

{
  "description": "Develop and review the strongest evidence-bound opposing case when Lucia is asked for an opinion on a concrete legal, tax or compliance position or explicitly for an opposing opinion. Informational research alone does not activate it; respect an instruction to omit it.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "adversarial-opinion",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: adversarial-opinion\ndescription: Develop and review the strongest evidence-bound opposing case when Lucia is asked for an opinion on a concrete legal, tax or compliance position or explicitly for an opposing opinion. Informational research alone does not activate it; respect an instruction to omit it.\n---\n<!-- MPARANZA_REPORTING_BEGIN -->\n## Task reporting and recovery\n\nFor every substantive user mandate, follow\n`skills/lucia/references/workflow-usage.md` from this installation's root.\nStart one primary task before preparation, using `usage/pipelines.json`; nested\nspecialists, retries and Studio Archive infrastructure reuse that task. Record\nonly the observed whole-task outcome. Discover `lucia_incident_host_link`,\nincluding deferred tools, and verify this run's Computer ID on the server.\nBuild the report input from actual phases even for chat-only drafts; missing\nclient files or a prepared input JSON do not waive reporting. Show the readable\nlocal model-data report under `skills/lucia/references/model-data-report-contract.md`, link its\nactual signed receipt, and ask once for the user's 1–5 stars after delivery.\nOnly user-authored feedback is submitted; tests remain explicitly marked.\nFollow `skills/lucia/references/incident-recovery.md` for automatic technical\nreporting, evidence requests and targeted remedies. Use the HTTPS browser recovery page in that reference if\nlocal execution is unavailable. Never ask the user to relay logs or repeat consent\nfor technical reporting. Recovery requires an observed successful retry of the\noriginal task and inputs, bound to the original report and current remedy.\nTutorials remain local-only and are excluded from task usage and ratings.\n<!-- MPARANZA_REPORTING_END -->\n\n\n<!-- LUCIA_OPENAI_ONBOARDING_BEGIN -->\nOnboarding is optional. Continue ordinary professional work immediately,\nincluding direct specialist invocation, without checking or completing a local\nonboarding profile. Missing, unfinished, inaccessible or corrupt onboarding state,\nor unavailable voice/window controls, must never block ordinary work. Do not\nautomatically start, resume or repeatedly offer onboarding.\nOnly for a user-requested tutorial or a native teaching handoff, read\n`../lucia/references/local-onboarding.md`. A verified paired lesson worker\nexecutes only its bound lesson and token; never bypass tutorial validation.\nTutorial profiles, progress, examples and feedback remain local; never send a\nchange request, stamp a tutorial receipt or call hosted interviews for a tutorial.\nCurrent user requests take precedence over saved preferences.\n<!-- LUCIA_OPENAI_ONBOARDING_END -->\n\n# Parere contrapposto\n\nAfter substantive use of this workflow, read and follow the `Plugin Improvement Feedback` section in `../lucia/SKILL.md`.\n\nResolve `../../modules/deep-research-validator` from this skill directory when\nit exists; otherwise resolve `../../../deep-research-validator` in repository\nsource. Read its `skills/adversarial-opinion/SKILL.md` completely and follow it.\nTreat the Lucia root as the invoking product root. The method, scope rule,\ndurable helper and comparison checks are shared with the other product.\nDo not fork the method or add an opposing examination to informational research.\n\nFor a supplied position without a reviewed original and answer contract, first\nfollow `../quesito-legale-fiscale/SKILL.md`. Review the opposing result with\n`../legal-tax-answer-review/SKILL.md`; do not recursively request an opposing\nopinion about the opposing opinion. Final choices remain with the professional.\n"
}