Update to Lucia

{
  "description": "Turn a selected tracked Word agreement into source-linked negotiating positions, with every revision and comment accounted for, blank responses by default and saved round comparisons. Use for a concise negotiation table, not automatic acceptance, sending or a replacement contract redline.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "posizioni-negoziali",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: posizioni-negoziali\ndescription: Turn a selected tracked Word agreement into source-linked negotiating positions, with every revision and comment accounted for, blank responses by default and saved round comparisons. Use for a concise negotiation table, not automatic acceptance, sending or a replacement contract redline.\n---\n<!-- MPARANZA_REPORTING_BEGIN -->\n## Task reporting and recovery\n\nFor every substantive user mandate, follow\n`skills/lucia/references/workflow-usage.md` from this installation's root.\nStart one primary task before preparation, using `usage/pipelines.json`; nested\nspecialists, retries and Studio Archive infrastructure reuse that task. Record\nonly the observed whole-task outcome. Discover `lucia_incident_host_link`,\nincluding deferred tools, and verify this run's Computer ID on the server.\nBuild the report input from actual phases even for chat-only drafts; missing\nclient files or a prepared input JSON do not waive reporting. Show the readable\nlocal model-data report under `skills/lucia/references/model-data-report-contract.md`, link its\nactual signed receipt, and ask once for the user's 1–5 stars after delivery.\nOnly user-authored feedback is submitted; tests remain explicitly marked.\nFollow `skills/lucia/references/incident-recovery.md` for automatic technical\nreporting, evidence requests and targeted remedies. Use the HTTPS browser recovery page in that reference if\nlocal execution is unavailable. Never ask the user to relay logs or repeat consent\nfor technical reporting. Recovery requires an observed successful retry of the\noriginal task and inputs, bound to the original report and current remedy.\nTutorials remain local-only and are excluded from task usage and ratings.\n<!-- MPARANZA_REPORTING_END -->\n\n\n# Posizioni negoziali con Lucia\n\nPer un Word revisionato o una richiesta di tabella delle posizioni negoziali,\nriusa il pack e il contesto già preparati per `confronto-documenti` o revisione\ncontratti; il DOCX revisionato può anche essere l'unico input iniziale.\nLeggi `../revisione-contratti/references/prassi-italiana.md` e, per un Word\ndella tabella o successive revisioni richieste, `../revisione-contratti/references/word-handoff.md`.\nIl confronto ordinario fra due documenti conserva il proprio contratto.\n\nRisolvi `../../vendor/modules/deal_redux` dalla directory della skill se\npresente; nel repository usa `../../../_shared/vendor/modules/deal_redux`.\nLeggi integralmente `workflow.md` e i suoi riferimenti e applica il metodo.\nIl root del prodotto è `../..`; `<helper-dir>` è `../../scripts`, in assoluto.\nDal root esegui `python scripts/check_dependencies.py` e\n`python scripts/managed_python_runtime.py status`; usa il Python condiviso\nriportato per i helper, fuori dalle cartelle del cliente.\n\nScegli la cartella autorizzata della pratica. Riprendi inventario, review e\nsnapshot già salvati; non reinizializzare una run. Per un nuovo round prepara\nuna nuova cartella con le nuove prove e la precedente review scelta.\nL'avvocato decide posizione e risposta; il modello raggruppa e spiega gli effetti.\nNon accettare revisioni, modificare l'originale o inviare il risultato.\n\nQuando occorre un approfondimento giuridico, leggi\n`../quesito-legale-fiscale/SKILL.md` e usa il metodo completo del prodotto\nsenza ricerche parallele sul medesimo quesito o dati del cliente nelle query.\n\nAfter substantive use of this workflow, read and follow the `Plugin Improvement Feedback` section in `../lucia/SKILL.md`.\n"
}