Update to EULEX.AI

{
  "description": "Research how Croatian courts applied the law to a legal issue, find sudska praksa or Supreme Court practice, and read a particular decision by case number or ECLI. Retrieve the decision before quoting its reasoning and distinguish its facts from a statutory rule. Does not cover Constitutional Court, ECHR or other national court corpora.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 2095
    }
  ],
  "name": "croatian-case-law",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: croatian-case-law\ndescription: Research how Croatian courts applied the law to a legal issue, find sudska praksa or Supreme Court practice, and read a particular decision by case number or ECLI. Retrieve the decision before quoting its reasoning and distinguish its facts from a statutory rule. Does not cover Constitutional Court, ECHR or other national court corpora.\nlicense: Proprietary — see https://eulex.ai/legal\nmetadata:\n  compatibility: Requires the EULEX.AI MCP connector (https://mcp.eulex.ai/mcp) to be connected and authorised. Without it none of the retrieval steps can run.\n  author: Augment Ltd\n  version: \"1.3.14\"\n---\n\n# Croatian case law research\n\nThe `@hr` corpus holds decisions of Croatian courts from odluke.sudovi.hr\n(count, with its stats_as_of date, via `about`). Constitutional Court decisions are not in it as case law;\nthey appear as Narodne novine publications. EU (CJEU) judgments live in the\n`@eu` corpus and are reached differently — see the end of this skill.\n\nUse the tools of the EULEX.AI connection (`https://mcp.eulex.ai/mcp`) with\nthe exact names the host shows. If it is unavailable, say retrieval needs it;\nnever cite a decision from memory.\n\n## Known case number or ECLI: open it directly\n\n`get_decision(uri: \"Rev-1356/2024-2\")` — no search first. It accepts spaces\ninstead of hyphens, missing diacritics (`Gz`), two-digit years\n(`Revr-615/08`), a missing final suffix, an ECLI, or `@hr/decision/{uuid}`.\nIf several courts use the number, the response has `candidates[]`; pick by\ncourt and date, or ask.\n\n## Topic: search, then open\n\n**1. Search** with `case_law_search(query: ...)` in Croatian legal terms —\nthe decisions are Croatian and the search is semantic over their reasoning\nand operative part. Filters:\n\n- `court_codes` — comma-separated, for example `\"vs\"` (Vrhovni sud). Other\n  codes appear in `court_code` of the results; reuse them.\n- `reference_only: true` — VSRH reference decisions, for settled positions.\n- `date_from` (inclusive) / `date_to` (**exclusive**), `YYYY-MM-DD`.\n\nEach `decisions[]` entry has `decision_number`, `court_name`,\n`decision_date`, `ecli`, `citation` and up to three matching passages in\n`segments`. Its URI is in `sources[].id` (`@hr/decision/{court_decision_id}`).\n\n**2. Triage on the passages,** then open only the decisions that matter.\n`get_decision` returns the full text by default (often 50–70 KB); to check\nseveral decisions cheaply, pass `include_text: false` and\n`include_citations: true` first.\n\n**3. Follow the law the court applied.** With `include_citations: true`,\neach `citations[]` entry has `cited_title`, `article_ref_raw`,\n`resolution_confidence` and, when resolved, `article_uri` and\n`resolved_regulation_version_id`.\n\n- `article_uri` alone returns **today's** wording.\n- For the wording the court applied, call\n  `get_article(uri: <article_uri>, version_id: <resolved_regulation_version_id>)`.\n- Citation resolution can point to the wrong act. If `cited_title` and the\n  resolved title disagree, trust `cited_title` and address that act yourself\n  (`@hr/<official title>`).\n\n**4. Check that the rule is still the same.** Fetch the article without a\nversion and compare, or use the `point-in-time-law` skill. A decision applying\nsince-amended wording may no longer reflect the law.\n\n**5. Instance chain (optional).** `include_related: true` lists earlier and\nlater decisions in the same matter. The source links them by case number\nacross courts, so a `chronology_warning` or an odd court pairing means the\nlink may be wrong — open the decision before relying on it.\n\n## Inspect a decision in the source viewer\n\nWhen the user asks to open the source, call `view_source` with the returned\n`@hr/decision/...` source ID. The card contains retrieved decision wording.\nKeep the official citation and disclose any missing text or source link; the\nviewer does not validate cited legislation or resolve conflicting case metadata.\n\n## Coverage to disclose\n\n- Few or no results do not mean the courts have not ruled; the search covers\n  the decisions indexed so far. Say so.\n- `finality_date` is always empty; use `finality_status`.\n- Count what you found. One decision is not settled case law.\n\n## EU judgments (CJEU)\n\n`case_law_search` and `get_decision` are `@hr` only. For CJEU judgments use\n`search(query: ..., scopes: [\"@eu\"], in_force_only: false)` — judgments are\ndropped when `in_force_only` is true — or\n`get_related(uri: <EU act>, relation_type: \"related_case_law\")`, which lists\njudgments concerning an act (metadata, not text).\n\n## Output\n\n- What the courts held, as a proposition, and how many decisions support it.\n- Each decision: court, case number, date, ECLI when present, link from\n  `source_url`.\n- The provisions applied, quoted from `get_article` in the version the court\n  used, and whether that wording is still in force.\n- An explicit note when coverage is thin.\n\n## Do not\n\n- Do not generalise one decision into a settled position.\n- Do not treat a related-decision link as agreement; it may be an appeal, a\n  correction or a later instance.\n- Do not present case law as predicting the outcome of the user's matter.\n- Do not put the user's party names or confidential facts into the query.\n"
}