Security Codex plugins
Follow your plugin and competitors. Review changes to their positioning, capabilities and published terms, with dated source evidence.
Explore 11,121 plugins across 14 categories.
Follow up to 10 plugins for free. Newest means first added to our catalog, not the publisher’s release date.
Security plugins 6
1–6 of 6All words must match. Use quotes for an exact phrase.
| Plugin / developer | Category | Follow |
|---|---|---|
CVE Risk CheckAgent Tools Publisher full description …h dependencies in this package-lock.json should I fix first?". CVE Risk Check reads two free public sources. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) gives the description, the CVSS score and severity, the publication date, a link to a patch or vendor advisory when one is tagged, and whether the CI… …s matched to its known advisories in OSV.dev, which collects the GitHub Advisory Database and other open databases. The advisories' CVE ids are then checked against the CISA exploited list and EPSS. The answer is the few packages to fix first, each with a priority (malicious, exploited, likely, rout… Show in context →1 more matching sourcesPublisher capabilities · listing …onally filtered by a product word Links a patch or vendor advisory when NVD tags one, and names its sources and dates Show in context → |
SecurityVersion 1.2.0 | View details → |
ScamCheckmmcco Publisher full description …not prove a message is safe. ScamCheck also returns practical safety tips and official reporting resources (the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre). It is an information and prevention tool; it does not contact anyone, does not report on your behalf and does not open attachments. Show in context →2 more matching sourcesPublisher capabilities · listing …ce of a signal does not prove a message safe. Also gives fraud safety tips and official reporting resources. Read-only, stateless, no account, no files read. Show in context →Publisher description …ing risk signals with a deterministic heuristic model, and get safety tips and official reporting resources. An analysis of risk signals, not a guaranteed verdict; read-only, stateless, no account. Show in context → |
SecurityVersion 0.1.0 | View details → |
ArrowMemArrowMem Publisher full description …es today and what is planned, which government disability-claim packs run inside ArrowMem, what the open Data Dignity Standard (v0.5 draft for public comment) says, and verified facts about a local business, entered by hand from its own published sources with its consent, each with its source and date. A security alert relay can also send a push notice to you or your family. The check tools work only from diagnostic output you paste; they do n… Show in context → |
SecurityVersion 1.0.1 | View details → |
Frame Security ScanFrame (lambdasec) Publisher description Guides a step-by-step security scan of Python code with the open-source Frame command-line tool. Show in context →1 more matching sourcesPublisher full description Guides a step-by-step security scan of Python code with the open-source Frame command-line tool. The workflow checks that the Frame CLI is installed (and points you to the README install steps if it is not, without installing anything itself), runs frame scan, opti… Show in context → |
SecurityVersion 0.1.2 | View details → |
Orca SecurityOrca Security Publisher description …For teams that want the reasoning without writing the prompts, Orca maintains the AI Skills Hub, an open-source GitHub repo of agent skills. Type "triage alert orca-9012345" and the orca-alert-triage skill handles retrieval, analysis, and formatting. Teams can fork it, modify it, and extend it to their o… Show in context → |
SecurityVersion 1.0.0 | View details → |
ScreenataScreenata Publisher full description …then re-run the check to verify the result. Draft security policies from your recorded answers and open direct browser links to review controls, tests, policies, risks and evidence. After signing in to Screenata and selecting a workspace, assess selected cloud accounts, identity services, code repo… …account-specific consent; provider credentials stay out of chat and tool arguments, and repository source stays local. Fix availability depends on the check and permissions, policies need human approval, and baseline scores are separate from audit readiness. Your auditor issues the report or certif… Show in context → |
SecurityVersion 0.1.2 | View details → |