← Files Investment BankingARCHIVED FILE
skills/private-credit-underwriting/references/examples.md
3.46 KB · Oct 2, 2026 · 00:27 UTC
# Private Credit Examples Use this reference for example language and formatting patterns. Compact examples apply only to explicitly requested short screens or narrow updates. Replace placeholders with source-backed facts; do not reuse example numbers as assumptions. ## Table Of Contents - [Explicit Quick Screen Example](#explicit-quick-screen-example) - [Debt Sizing Conclusion Example](#debt-sizing-conclusion-example) - [Covenant And Liquidity Summary Example](#covenant-and-liquidity-summary-example) - [Distressed Watch Example](#distressed-watch-example) - [Decline Recommendation Example](#decline-recommendation-example) ## Explicit Quick Screen Example ```markdown ## Recommendation Proceed only if leverage is sized to lender-after-haircut EBITDA and latest monthly liquidity confirms at least [x] months of runway. Current materials support a `screening-only` view because lender EBITDA, covenant definitions, and borrowing-base availability are not yet tied out. ## Why this could work - Recurring revenue and contract visibility appear to support baseline repayment. - Sponsor equity contribution provides initial cushion, subject to confirmation. - Proposed first-lien structure may be acceptable if collateral and reporting are tightened. ## Why this could fail - Debt capacity depends on add-backs that are still management claims. - Downside case creates covenant pressure before modeled deleveraging. - Liquidity relies on revolver availability that has not been tested against eligible collateral. ``` ## Debt Sizing Conclusion Example ```markdown The supportable debt range is constrained by liquidity and covenant headroom, not the headline leverage multiple. At [x.x]x lender-after-haircut EBITDA, gross leverage appears manageable in the base case, but the downside case reduces FCCR to [x.x]x and pushes minimum liquidity to $[x]. I would size total debt at the lower of the coverage-constrained amount and the collateral / borrowing-base limit, then require updated monthly financials and covenant definitions before treating the range as committee-ready. ``` ## Covenant And Liquidity Summary Example ```markdown Covenant conclusion is a proxy because the governing EBITDA definition has not been provided. Using lender-after-haircut EBITDA, max leverage headroom is [x.x] turns in the lender case and turns negative in [period] under the downside case. Liquidity breaks first: cash plus revolver availability bottoms at $[x] before EBITDA recovers, so the proposed package needs a minimum liquidity covenant, monthly borrowing-base reporting, and a tighter add-back cap. ``` ## Distressed Watch Example ```markdown Move the borrower to watchlist and prepare amendment discussions. The first pressure point is liquidity, not maturity: cash and revolver availability fall below minimum operating needs in [period], and collateral coverage is not current enough to support a recovery conclusion. Immediate asks are latest 13-week cash flow, borrowing-base certificate, AR aging, sponsor support plan, and covenant certificate. Until those are received, output posture is `not-committee-ready`. ``` ## Decline Recommendation Example ```markdown Decline under the proposed structure. The credit requires unsupported EBITDA adjustments, has weak cash conversion, and breaches the lender-view covenant proxy under a modest downside before any credible deleveraging occurs. The deal could be reconsidered only with lower debt, tighter reporting, confirmed collateral value, and source-backed lender EBITDA. ```
SHA-256: 70c72125e2cfccc7b124dbbb882b1a84c306ea1b59bcc55e1c0b67df0dea3f13