← Files Investment BankingARCHIVED FILE
skills/scenario-sensitivity-generator/references/scenario-overlay-contract.md
3.02 KB · Oct 2, 2026 · 00:27 UTC
# Scenario Overlay Contract When transaction scenarios need to feed a workbook or another skill, produce a scenario overlay table with these fields. | field | purpose | |---|---| | transaction_version | model version, as-of date, model file, committee case, client case, lender case, or market-data snapshot | | sensitivity_basis | `supplied model`, `corrected scenario-ready base`, `audit-indicative diagnostic overlay`, or `not suitable for sensitivity reliance` | | embedded_corrections_or_adjustments | corrections or diagnostic adjustments already incorporated in the selected baseline, or `none identified` | | excluded_unresolved_items | material unresolved items not incorporated in displayed sensitivity outputs | | case | base, upside, downside, stress, lender case, sponsor case, management case, market case, restructuring case, etc. | | model_module | valuation, comps, DCF, LBO, merger, operating forecast, debt schedule, covenant, financing, recovery waterfall, sensitivity exhibit | | transaction_driver | exact driver being changed | | baseline_value | current source-model value | | scenario_value | proposed case value | | delta_type | absolute, percentage change, bps change, replacement, timing shift, ramp, floor, cap | | start_period | first affected period, if applicable | | end_period | last affected period, if applicable | | deal_rationale | why the change belongs in the transaction case | | controllability | controllable, partially controllable, external market, document-driven, legal/process-driven, or mechanical | | deal_owner | coverage, M&A, LevFin, ECM, DCM, restructuring, sponsor, lender, client, legal, tax, accounting, diligence, or model owner | | review_status | proposed, reviewed, approved, rejected, expired, or not model-validated | | expiry_review_date | date, market-window checkpoint, committee date, or model-refresh cycle when assumption must be revisited | | output_impact | enterprise value, equity value, value per share, premium, IRR, MOIC, accretion/dilution, proceeds, dilution, debt capacity, leverage, coverage, covenant cushion, liquidity, recovery, or fulcrum | | caveat | limitation, missing source, as-of-date mismatch, unsupported claim, or execution risk | ## Handoff rules - Use one row per changed driver per scenario. - State the sensitivity basis consistently in the first-read tab, scenario overlay, and final response. - Do not present a corrected scenario-ready base or audit-indicative diagnostic overlay as the unmodified source model. - If the baseline is `not suitable for sensitivity reliance`, do not display unsupported decision outputs as a base case; state the blocker or use an expressly labeled diagnostic overlay. - Do not hide formula changes inside transaction cases. - Keep historical periods locked unless explicitly modeling pro forma history. - Keep source, market, and model as-of dates visible when they affect outputs. - Use the overlay as the source of truth for downstream model updates. - If the overlay contains placeholders, label them and keep the case status as not model-validated.
SHA-256: 064936a1d48ba15284fa7ef4a959f4a5655f92963485d32a86a06713e8aa5da8