modules/previdenza-inps/scripts/memo_labels.py

"""Localized INPS memo labels; supplied evidence and conclusions are unchanged."""

from __future__ import annotations

__all__ = ["MEMO_TEXT"]

MEMO_TEXT: dict[str, dict[str, str]] = {
    "it": {
        "title": "Verifica della posizione contributiva INPS",
        "draft": "BOZZA PER REVISIONE PROFESSIONALE",
        "scope": "Perimetro",
        "question": "Quesito",
        "facts": "Fatti documentati",
        "timeline": "Cronologia esplicita",
        "fact_refs": "fatti",
        "no_events": "Nessun evento cronologico esplicito registrato.",
        "conclusions": "Conclusioni sottoposte a verifica delle fonti",
        "support": "Supporto",
        "reasoning": "Ragionamento",
        "uncertainty": "Incertezza o correzione",
        "none": "Nessuna indicata.",
        "sources": "Fonti",
        "dependencies": "Fatti dipendenti",
        "calculations": "Ricalcoli approvati",
        "not_calculated": "non calcolato",
        "no_calculations": "Nessun ricalcolo approvato incluso.",
        "missing": "Evidenze o chiarimenti mancanti",
        "no_missing": "Nessuna richiesta aggiuntiva registrata; il professionista deve comunque confermare la completezza del fascicolo.",
        "limits": "Limiti e responsabilità",
        "requests": "Richieste di documenti e chiarimenti",
        "confirmed": "confermato",
        "pending": "da rivedere",
        "supported": "supportato dalle fonti",
        "partially_supported": "parzialmente supportato",
        "not_supported": "non supportato",
        "contradicted": "contraddetto dalle fonti",
        "uncertain": "incerto",
        "passed": "controlli superati",
        "introduction": "Il documento collega le osservazioni alle fonti e indica i chiarimenti necessari. È una bozza da rivedere professionalmente prima di qualsiasi decisione o invio.",
        "model_review": "La selezione del quadro giuridico, delle fonti e delle conclusioni è stata svolta con ragionamento del modello e deve essere verificata dal professionista.",
        "mechanical_scope": "Gli script hanno controllato soltanto forma, provenienza, riferimenti e aritmetica esplicitamente approvata.",
        "no_inference": "Nessuna classificazione, aliquota, prescrizione o scadenza è stata scelta automaticamente.",
        "review_state": "Stato del documento: **pronto per revisione professionale**, non firmato e non depositabile.",
    },
    "en": {
        "title": "Review of the INPS contribution record",
        "draft": "DRAFT FOR PROFESSIONAL REVIEW",
        "scope": "Scope",
        "question": "Professional question",
        "facts": "Documented facts",
        "timeline": "Documented chronology",
        "fact_refs": "facts",
        "no_events": "No explicit chronological events recorded.",
        "conclusions": "Conclusions checked against sources",
        "support": "Source support",
        "reasoning": "Reasoning review",
        "uncertainty": "Uncertainty or correction",
        "none": "None recorded.",
        "sources": "Sources",
        "dependencies": "Supporting facts",
        "calculations": "Approved recalculations",
        "not_calculated": "not calculated",
        "no_calculations": "No approved recalculation included.",
        "missing": "Missing evidence or clarifications",
        "no_missing": "No additional request recorded; the professional must still confirm that the case file is complete.",
        "limits": "Limits and responsibilities",
        "requests": "Document and clarification requests",
        "confirmed": "confirmed",
        "pending": "pending review",
        "supported": "supported by sources",
        "partially_supported": "partially supported",
        "not_supported": "not supported",
        "contradicted": "contradicted by sources",
        "uncertain": "uncertain",
        "passed": "checks passed",
        "introduction": "This document links observations to their sources and identifies the clarifications needed. It is a draft for professional review before any decision or submission.",
        "model_review": "The model selected the legal framework, sources and conclusions through reasoning; the professional must verify them.",
        "mechanical_scope": "The scripts checked only structure, provenance, references and explicitly approved arithmetic.",
        "no_inference": "No classification, contribution rate, limitation period or deadline was selected automatically.",
        "review_state": "Document status: **ready for professional review**, unsigned and not ready for submission.",
    },
    "fr": {
        "title": "Examen du relevé de cotisations INPS",
        "draft": "PROJET POUR REVUE PROFESSIONNELLE",
        "scope": "Périmètre",
        "question": "Question professionnelle",
        "facts": "Faits documentés",
        "timeline": "Chronologie documentée",
        "fact_refs": "faits",
        "no_events": "Aucun événement chronologique explicite enregistré.",
        "conclusions": "Conclusions examinées au regard des sources",
        "support": "Appui des sources",
        "reasoning": "Examen du raisonnement",
        "uncertainty": "Incertitude ou correction",
        "none": "Aucune indiquée.",
        "sources": "Sources",
        "dependencies": "Faits à l’appui",
        "calculations": "Recalculs approuvés",
        "not_calculated": "non calculé",
        "no_calculations": "Aucun recalcul approuvé inclus.",
        "missing": "Éléments ou précisions manquants",
        "no_missing": "Aucune demande supplémentaire enregistrée ; le professionnel doit néanmoins confirmer que le dossier est complet.",
        "limits": "Limites et responsabilités",
        "requests": "Demandes de documents et de précisions",
        "confirmed": "confirmé",
        "pending": "à revoir",
        "supported": "étayé par les sources",
        "partially_supported": "partiellement étayé",
        "not_supported": "non étayé",
        "contradicted": "contredit par les sources",
        "uncertain": "incertain",
        "passed": "contrôles réussis",
        "introduction": "Ce document relie les observations à leurs sources et indique les précisions nécessaires. Ce projet doit être revu par un professionnel avant toute décision ou transmission.",
        "model_review": "Le modèle a sélectionné le cadre juridique, les sources et les conclusions par raisonnement ; le professionnel doit les vérifier.",
        "mechanical_scope": "Les scripts ont uniquement contrôlé la forme, la provenance, les références et les calculs expressément approuvés.",
        "no_inference": "Aucune classification, aucun taux, délai de prescription ou échéance n’a été sélectionné automatiquement.",
        "review_state": "État du document : **prêt pour revue professionnelle**, non signé et non prêt au dépôt.",
    },
    "de": {
        "title": "Prüfung des INPS Beitragskontos",
        "draft": "ENTWURF ZUR FACHLICHEN PRÜFUNG",
        "scope": "Umfang",
        "question": "Fachliche Frage",
        "facts": "Dokumentierte Tatsachen",
        "timeline": "Dokumentierte Chronologie",
        "fact_refs": "Tatsachen",
        "no_events": "Keine ausdrücklich dokumentierten zeitlichen Ereignisse.",
        "conclusions": "Anhand der Quellen geprüfte Schlussfolgerungen",
        "support": "Quellenbeleg",
        "reasoning": "Prüfung der Begründung",
        "uncertainty": "Unsicherheit oder Korrektur",
        "none": "Keine angegeben.",
        "sources": "Quellen",
        "dependencies": "Zugrunde liegende Tatsachen",
        "calculations": "Freigegebene Nachberechnungen",
        "not_calculated": "nicht berechnet",
        "no_calculations": "Keine freigegebene Nachberechnung enthalten.",
        "missing": "Fehlende Belege oder Klärungen",
        "no_missing": "Keine zusätzliche Anforderung erfasst; die Vollständigkeit der Akte ist weiterhin fachlich zu bestätigen.",
        "limits": "Grenzen und Verantwortlichkeiten",
        "requests": "Anforderungen von Unterlagen und Klärungen",
        "confirmed": "bestätigt",
        "pending": "noch zu prüfen",
        "supported": "durch Quellen gestützt",
        "partially_supported": "teilweise gestützt",
        "not_supported": "nicht gestützt",
        "contradicted": "durch Quellen widerlegt",
        "uncertain": "ungewiss",
        "passed": "Prüfungen bestanden",
        "introduction": "Dieses Dokument ordnet Beobachtungen ihren Quellen zu und benennt nötige Klärungen. Der Entwurf erfordert eine fachliche Prüfung vor jeder Entscheidung oder Einreichung.",
        "model_review": "Das Modell hat Rechtsrahmen, Quellen und Schlussfolgerungen durch Begründung ausgewählt; diese bedürfen fachlicher Prüfung.",
        "mechanical_scope": "Die Skripte prüften nur Struktur, Herkunft, Referenzen und ausdrücklich freigegebene Berechnungen.",
        "no_inference": "Keine Einstufung, kein Beitragssatz, keine Verjährungsfrist und keine Frist wurde automatisch gewählt.",
        "review_state": "Dokumentenstatus: **bereit zur fachlichen Prüfung**, nicht unterzeichnet und nicht einreichungsbereit.",
    },
    "es": {
        "title": "Revisión del registro de cotizaciones INPS",
        "draft": "BORRADOR PARA REVISIÓN PROFESIONAL",
        "scope": "Alcance",
        "question": "Cuestión profesional",
        "facts": "Hechos documentados",
        "timeline": "Cronología explícita",
        "fact_refs": "hechos",
        "no_events": "No se ha registrado ningún evento cronológico explícito.",
        "conclusions": "Conclusiones sujetas a verificación de fuentes",
        "support": "Soporte",
        "reasoning": "Revisión del razonamiento",
        "uncertainty": "Incertidumbre o corrección",
        "none": "No se ha indicado ninguna.",
        "sources": "Fuentes",
        "dependencies": "Hechos de los que depende",
        "calculations": "Recálculos aprobados",
        "not_calculated": "no calculado",
        "no_calculations": "No se ha incluido ningún recálculo aprobado.",
        "missing": "Evidencias o aclaraciones pendientes",
        "no_missing": "No se ha registrado ninguna solicitud adicional; el profesional debe confirmar en todo caso que el expediente está completo.",
        "limits": "Límites y responsabilidades",
        "requests": "Solicitudes de documentos y aclaraciones",
        "confirmed": "confirmado",
        "pending": "pendiente de revisión",
        "supported": "respaldado por fuentes",
        "partially_supported": "parcialmente respaldado",
        "not_supported": "no respaldado",
        "contradicted": "contradicho por fuentes",
        "uncertain": "incierto",
        "passed": "controles superados",
        "introduction": "Este documento vincula las observaciones con sus fuentes e indica las aclaraciones necesarias. Es un borrador para revisión profesional antes de cualquier decisión o envío.",
        "model_review": "La selección del marco jurídico, de las fuentes y de las conclusiones se ha realizado con razonamiento del modelo y debe ser verificada por el profesional.",
        "mechanical_scope": "Los scripts solo han comprobado la forma, la procedencia, las referencias y la aritmética aprobada de manera explícita.",
        "no_inference": "No se ha elegido automáticamente ninguna clasificación, tipo de cotización, plazo de prescripción o fecha límite.",
        "review_state": "Estado del documento: **listo para revisión profesional**, sin firma y no apto para presentación.",
    },
}