skills/writing-strategy/references/misunderstanding_truth_conviction.md

# Misunderstanding → Truth → Conviction / 오해 → 진실 → 확신

- English name: Misunderstanding → Truth → Conviction
- Korean name: 오해 → 진실 → 확신
- Selection category: myth
- Use when: Use when the reader likely holds a misconception that the draft should correct persuasively.
- Avoid when: Avoid when the misconception is not common or would sound patronizing.

## Writing Pattern

**Use this fixed three-step flow**

- Misunderstanding
  - Surface common misconceptions, biases, or assumptions.
  - Approach with empathy and inquiry rather than pure negation.
- Truth
  - Use data, cases, and logic to show the misconception is inaccurate.
  - Cite objective sources where possible to build trust.
- Conviction
  - Lead the reader to a clear conclusion and prompt action or judgment.

## Example Writing Outline

1. **“AI Can’t Replace People Yet?”**: Many think AI is merely a helper—but that view reflects pre-2022 benchmarks. (Misunderstanding)
2. **Modern AI Executes Planning and Design**: The workflow interprets planning documents, structures stories, and auto-generates sections. (Truth)
3. **Hundreds of Companies Already Adopted It**: AI article tools have boosted productivity by 80%+ and augment designers rather than replace them. (Conviction)

## Writing Notes

- Phrase Misunderstanding in a non-confrontational, reader-voiced manner (e.g., “Many believe…”, “A common question is…”).
- In Truth, back claims with verifiable numbers, cases, or comparisons.
- In Conviction, deliver an action-driving message (e.g., “It’s time to adopt,” “There’s no reason to delay.”).
- The emotional curve should move from doubt → resolution → conversion.