← Files LuciaARCHIVED FILE

modules/deep-research-validator/assets/review-workbench-adapter.json

8.11 KB · Oct 2, 2026 · 00:30 UTC

↓ Download file

{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0",
  "plugin": "deep-research-validator",
  "title": "Answer Validation Review",
  "reviewTitle": "Source Identity, Support, Reasoning, And Judgment Review",
  "queueTitle": "Claims",
  "detailTitle": "Claim Evidence",
  "detailMode": "claim-desk",
  "detailHelp": "Review source identity, semantic support, reasoning, issue treatment, and professional-judgment limits separately before deciding.",
  "detailGroups": [
    {
      "title": "Claim",
      "variant": "prose",
      "fields": [
        "claim",
        "claim_text",
        "title"
      ],
      "empty": "No claim text."
    },
    {
      "title": "Source Identity & Access",
      "variant": "source",
      "fields": [
        "source_checks",
        "mechanical_source_observations"
      ],
      "empty": "No source-identity assessment."
    },
    {
      "title": "Semantic Source Support",
      "variant": "source",
      "fields": [
        "support"
      ],
      "empty": "No source-support fields."
    },
    {
      "title": "Reasoning",
      "variant": "finding",
      "fields": [
        "reasoning"
      ],
      "empty": "No reasoning assessment."
    },
    {
      "title": "Professional Judgment",
      "variant": "finding",
      "fields": [
        "professional_judgment"
      ],
      "empty": "No professional-judgment assessment."
    },
    {
      "title": "Issues & Treatment",
      "variant": "finding",
      "fields": [
        "issues",
        "proposed_fix"
      ],
      "empty": "No finding fields."
    },
    {
      "title": "Disposition",
      "variant": "finding",
      "fields": [
        "disposition",
        "reviewer_action"
      ],
      "empty": "No disposition."
    }
  ],
  "panels": [
    "Claim",
    "Source identity & access",
    "Semantic source support",
    "Reasoning",
    "Professional judgment",
    "Issues & treatment",
    "Disposition"
  ],
  "localized": {
    "es": {
      "title": "Revisi\u00f3n de validaci\u00f3n de respuestas",
      "reviewTitle": "Revisi\u00f3n de fuentes, razonamiento y juicio profesional",
      "queueTitle": "Afirmaciones",
      "detailTitle": "Evidencia de la afirmaci\u00f3n",
      "detailHelp": "Revise por separado el respaldo de las fuentes, el razonamiento y los l\u00edmites del juicio profesional.",
      "search": "Buscar afirmaci\u00f3n, cita, fuente, gravedad, salida"
    },
    "it": {
      "title": "Revisione validazione risposta",
      "reviewTitle": "Revisione fonti, ragionamento e giudizio professionale",
      "queueTitle": "Claim",
      "detailTitle": "Evidenza claim",
      "detailHelp": "Rivedi separatamente supporto delle fonti, ragionamento e limiti del giudizio professionale.",
      "search": "Cerca claim, citazione, fonte, severita, output"
    },
    "fr": {
      "title": "Revue de validation de r\u00e9ponse",
      "reviewTitle": "Revue des sources, du raisonnement et du jugement professionnel",
      "queueTitle": "Assertions",
      "detailTitle": "Preuve de l'assertion",
      "detailHelp": "Examinez s\u00e9par\u00e9ment le support des sources, le raisonnement et les limites du jugement professionnel.",
      "search": "Chercher assertion, citation, source, severite, sortie"
    },
    "de": {
      "title": "Review der Antwortvalidierung",
      "reviewTitle": "Quellen-, Begr\u00fcndungs- und Ermessensreview",
      "queueTitle": "Aussagen",
      "detailTitle": "Nachweis zur Aussage",
      "detailHelp": "Quellenst\u00fctzung, Begr\u00fcndung und professionellen Ermessensspielraum getrennt pr\u00fcfen.",
      "search": "Aussage, Zitat, Quelle, Schweregrad, Ausgabe suchen"
    }
  },
  "saveTool": "save_deep_research_decisions",
  "applyTool": "apply_deep_research_decisions",
  "widgetType": "deep_research_review",
  "demo": {
    "review_type": "answer_validation_review",
    "items": [
      {
        "id": "claim-1",
        "item_type": "supported_claim",
        "title": "Claim 4: tax residence follows center of vital interests",
        "source_path": "answer.md",
        "output_path": "claims_review.json",
        "allowed_actions": [
          "accept",
          "reject",
          "edit",
          "mark_unclear",
          "skip"
        ],
        "recommended_action": "mark_unclear",
        "data": {
          "claim_text": "Residence follows the taxpayer's center of vital interests.",
          "source_checks": [
            {
              "source_ref": "source-001",
              "identity_status": "matches_cited_source",
              "identity_analysis": "The cited commentary and captured source are the same instrument.",
              "authority_relation": "secondary_commentary",
              "official_text_access": "not_applicable",
              "text_fidelity": "not_applicable",
              "access_analysis": "The claim relies on commentary rather than a reproduced primary text.",
              "limitations": [],
              "cited_passage": "centre of vital interests"
            }
          ],
          "support": {
            "status": "partially_supported",
            "analysis": "The passage supports treaty residence tie-breaker logic, not domestic filing deadlines."
          },
          "reasoning": {
            "status": "partially_sound",
            "analysis": "The treaty inference follows, but the answer extends it to an unsupported domestic deadline.",
            "supported_premises": [
              "Treaty tie-breaker premise"
            ],
            "missing_premises": [
              "Domestic filing deadline rule"
            ]
          },
          "professional_judgment": {
            "status": "professional_judgment_required",
            "analysis": "Applying the tie-breaker requires a fact-sensitive assessment.",
            "factors": [
              "Personal relations",
              "Economic relations"
            ],
            "alternative_interpretations": [
              "Either state may be the centre of vital interests"
            ]
          },
          "issues": [
            {
              "type": "partial_or_overbroad_support",
              "explanation": "The answer extends beyond the source.",
              "treatment_action": "narrow_claim",
              "treatment_status": "proposed",
              "treatment_explanation": "Limit the claim to the treaty tie-breaker."
            }
          ],
          "disposition": {
            "status": "revise",
            "analysis": "Narrow the claim.",
            "revised_claim": "Treaty residence may turn on the centre of vital interests."
          },
          "reviewer_action": "edit",
          "status": "needs_evidence",
          "severity": "medium",
          "review_notes": "The citation supports treaty tie-breaker logic but not local filing deadlines.",
          "claim_index": 4,
          "target_artifact": "claims_review.json",
          "target_records_key": "claims",
          "target_id_field": "claim_index",
          "target_record_id": "4",
          "target_field": "proposed_fix",
          "edit_hint": "Editing this claim writes the reviewer correction to proposed_fix in claims_review.json."
        },
        "evidence": [
          {
            "kind": "answer_validation_assessment",
            "support": {
              "status": "partially_supported"
            },
            "reasoning": {
              "status": "partially_sound"
            },
            "professional_judgment": {
              "status": "professional_judgment_required"
            }
          }
        ]
      },
      {
        "id": "source-1",
        "item_type": "source_limit",
        "title": "Source relevance: OECD Commentary",
        "source_path": "sources/oecd-commentary.txt",
        "output_path": "source_inventory.json",
        "allowed_actions": [
          "accept",
          "edit",
          "mark_unclear",
          "skip"
        ],
        "recommended_action": "accept",
        "data": {
          "source_title": "OECD Model Tax Convention Commentary",
          "status": "relevant",
          "source_url": "https://www.oecd.org/"
        },
        "evidence": [
          {
            "kind": "source_inventory",
            "relevance": "high"
          }
        ]
      }
    ]
  }
}

SHA-256: 5f295f506e378fee83909433dff20fe940ed9b5b0688fb7018d26fbff16535f8