skills/wsh-risk-assessment-review/SKILL.md

---
name: wsh-risk-assessment-review
description: Independently review an existing Singapore WSH risk assessment for omissions, weak causal wording, unsupported ratings, control gaps, duplication, and optimistic residual risk. Use for audit, challenge, or gap assessment; revise the source table only when requested.
---

# Review a WSH Risk Assessment

Review the supplied assessment as evidence, not as a trusted account of actual site conditions. A partial RA can still be reviewed: do not block the review merely because information is missing. Record missing information as a finding and ask only clarifications that materially affect conclusions.

## Review method

Check scope boundaries, work steps, non-routine tasks, interfaces, exposed groups, hazard-consequence wording, row granularity, control status, scoring rationale, organisational risk bands, hierarchy gaps, action ownership, verification, optimistic residual scores, duplication, and contradictions.

## Output

Lead with findings ordered by potential safety significance. For each finding give the affected row or section, evidence, why it matters, and a practical correction. Separate confirmed defects, missing evidence, and questions. Preserve the user's format and terminology when practical.

Do not silently rewrite the assessment. Provide a revised table or corrected rows only when the user asks, or after clearly distinguishing them from review findings. Never certify completeness or compliance.