← Files Compound WritingARCHIVED FILE
defaults/project-template/VOICE.md
4.21 KB · Oct 2, 2026 · 00:34 UTC
# VOICE.md Use this file to define how the writing should sound. `VOICE.md` contains syntax, diction, and tone rules. ## What belongs here - **Syntax:** sentence architecture, length, rhythm, cadence, punctuation, paragraph shape, lists, and transitions. - **Diction:** word choice, register, favored or banned language, technical vocabulary, idiom, imagery, and verbal tics. - **Tone:** the attitude and emotional register of the prose—warm, dry, direct, playful, restrained, skeptical, intimate, formal, or otherwise. Do not put argument, evidence standards, article structure, substantive requirements, or publication-readiness criteria in this file. Those belong in `STYLE.md`. Classification test: if a rule changes wording, sentence construction, or tone, it belongs here. If it changes the claim, support, organization, or readiness standard of the article, it belongs in `STYLE.md`. Split mixed feedback into separate rules. Start with the sections you can answer now. Add rules only when they are specific enough to change a draft. ## Scope - **Writer or voice:** [Name] - **Applies to:** [Your writing generally, a publication, or a format] - **More specific voice files:** [List any assignment-level overrides] When a more specific voice instruction conflicts with this file, follow the more specific rule for that assignment. ## Voice at its best Describe the voice using tensions and boundaries, not flattering adjectives alone. - [Example shape: Direct without becoming blunt.] - [Example shape: Intellectually ambitious without sounding academic.] - [Example shape: Warm without performing intimacy.] ## Diction and register ### Favor - [Kinds of words, images, verbs, or registers that belong] - [Preferred degree of formality] - [How technical, colloquial, emotional, or playful the language may become] ### Avoid - [Words or phrases that feel generic, inflated, corporate, or false] - [Registers that sound unlike the writer] - [Common model vocabulary to cut or replace] ### Register shifts - [When plain language should follow a technical idea] - [When humor, slang, or specialized language is welcome] - [Where the writing should remain restrained] ## Syntax and rhythm - **Sentence length:** [Short, long, varied; when each is useful] - **Paragraph shape:** [Dense, brief, single-turn, scannable, etc.] - **Cadence:** [How sentences build, release, interrupt, or land] - **Punctuation:** [Preferences for dashes, colons, semicolons, parentheses, fragments] - **Lists:** [How lists should sound and when to avoid them] - **Transitions:** [Preferred moves; stock transitions to remove] ## Signature moves Name repeatable sentence-level moves worth preserving. Explain the job each move performs so the model does not imitate it mechanically. | Move | What it does | When to use it | Failure mode | |---|---|---|---| | [Name] | [Effect on the sentence or reader] | [Useful context] | [How it becomes forced or repetitive] | ## Tics and patterns to avoid | Pattern | Why it weakens the writing | Preferred response | |---|---|---| | [Pattern] | [Specific consequence] | [Cut, rewrite, qualify, or replace] | ## Positive examples Keep full exemplars in `examples/`. Use short excerpts here only when they demonstrate one rule, and explain the principle instead of inviting imitation. ### [Rule demonstrated] > [Short example] **Why it works:** [What the example demonstrates about diction, syntax, rhythm, or voice] ## Negative examples ### [Failure demonstrated] > [Short example] **What is wrong:** [Specific diagnosis] **Preferred move:** [How to revise without prescribing one mandatory sentence] ## Voice review questions - Would the writer naturally choose these words? - Does the syntax follow the writer's characteristic sentence patterns? - Is the tone right for this writer and assignment? - Does the rhythm sound lived-in or mechanically polished? - Has editing removed useful texture, tension, or specificity? - Are any banned tics or model defaults still present? - Does an intentional exception work better than the stated rule here? ## Confirmed lessons Add durable lessons supported by repeated use or explicit writer judgment. Do not turn one-off choices into permanent rules. - [Date or piece]: [Confirmed lesson and why it generalizes]
SHA-256: 5c42871766e61960ea6abaaac47542fd09641235938a83325b2c9645521f5749