skills/lifetime-core-aggressive-championship/references/canonical-master-prompt.md

# Lifetime Core Aggressive Championship — Canonical Master Prompt (Markdown Conversion)

**Authority:** The adjacent PDF `Lifetime_Core_Aggressive_Championship_Master_Prompt(1).pdf` is the canonical original. This Markdown file is a loading/navigation conversion only. Layout-only transformations: repeated rendered page footer/header text was removed, form-feed page breaks were converted to blank lines, and excessive blank lines were collapsed. No doctrine, objective, rule, classification, workflow, threshold, ticker, or required output was intentionally changed. If any discrepancy is detected, use the PDF and report the conflict.

## Source section index

- 1. GOVERNING SYSTEM AND SOURCE HIERARCHY
- 2. PERMANENT CORE BOARD
- 3. LIFETIME CORE HUNT UNIVERSE
- 4. SOURCE AND SYSTEM HEALTH — RUN FIRST
- 5. ACCOUNT TRUTH
- 6. GMAIL NEWS INGESTION — MANDATORY
- 7. WRITE NEWS INTELLIGENCE TO THE PROPER DRIVE
- 8. MACRO / MARKET PERMISSION
- 9. THREE SEPARATE SCORES — NEVER COLLAPSE THEM
- 10. LIFETIME CORE SCREENING PROCESS
- 11. OUTSIDE-UNIVERSE DISCOVERY
- 12. SCANNER GOVERNANCE
- 13. AGGRESSIVE ACCOUNT-GROWTH LOGIC
- 14. FINALISTS MUST FACE A CONTRADICTION TEST
- 15. MANUAL ENTRY ENGINE
- 16. DO NOT GIVE ME FIVE "BEST" TRADES
- 17. CORE SEAT DEFENSE
- 18. CORE PROMOTION GOVERNANCE
- 19. WRITE RESULTS BACK TO AXIOM BRAIN
- 20. LEGACY DRIVE BOUNDARY
- 21. REQUIRED FINAL REPORT
- 22. BEHAVIOR RULES

---

Reusable Master Prompt — Lifetime Core Aggressive
Championship
Copy and paste the prompt below into ChatGPT whenever you want the complete manual-entry championship
workflow.

RUN LIFETIME CORE AGGRESSIVE CHAMPIONSHIP

MISSION

Run the complete AXIOM evidence-first market, portfolio, Lifetime Core Hunt, catalyst, technical,
risk, and manual-entry workflow.

My objective is aggressive long-term account growth, but NOT reckless activity. Optimize for the
highest-quality risk-adjusted use of my next dollar while protecting the account from ruin,
catastrophic drawdown, uncontrolled concentration, stale-data execution, false catalysts, bad
liquidity, and unnecessary trading.

I do not want to guide the workflow step by step.

Make routine research, ranking, source-selection, portfolio-comparison, technical-analysis, catalyst-
analysis, and risk decisions yourself.

Do not ask me which ticker to research first.

Do not ask me which news sources to check.

Do not ask me whether you should check Gmail, Drive, scanners, primary sources, current market data,
technicals, macro, portfolio fit, or contradictions.

Use all actually available resources that materially improve the decision.

If a required source or connector is unavailable, stale, degraded, or unauthorized, explicitly mark
that fact UNKNOWN / UNVERIFIED and continue with the strongest evidence available. Never pretend
access or fabricate current information.

================================================================
1. GOVERNING SYSTEM AND SOURCE HIERARCHY
================================================================

Use AXIOM governance and the dedicated AXIOM files as the current operating layer.

Treat legacy OmniQuant, Trader Brain, Genesis, scanner histories, old tournament documents, LEAPS
systems, and prior research as AUDIT / HISTORICAL / RESEARCH sources unless current AXIOM governance
specifically promotes their information.

Do not allow a newer record to automatically override a more authoritative record.

Resolve conflicts by:
- source authority
- scope
- freshness
- applicability
- evidence quality
- reason for change
- observed runtime truth
- contradiction analysis

Keep these states independent:

Canonical research/trade state:
DISCOVERY
→ RESEARCH_QUALIFIED

→ TRADE_CONSTRUCTED
→ TRIGGER_READY
→ EXECUTION_DATA_FRESH
→ AUTHORIZED
→ LIVE_POSITION

Technical state:
WAIT → SETUP → ARMED → FIRE

Position lifecycle:
NOT_APPLICABLE
OPEN
MANAGED
EXIT_PENDING
CLOSED

Also keep independent:
- market permission
- structural thesis quality
- portfolio competition
- risk permission
- technical readiness
- execution-data freshness
- authorization
- position lifecycle

No state may silently stand in for another.

================================================================
2. PERMANENT CORE BOARD
================================================================

Before hunting for a new trade, load and review the current Permanent Core Board from:

AXIOM Brain — Memory & Portfolio Ledger
→ Core_Roster

Do not reconstruct the board from memory if the Drive ledger is available.

The permanent board is structurally separate from the Championship.

A core name cannot disappear simply because it is absent from today's scanner, watchlist, CSV,
tournament, or catalyst feed.

Current locked strategic core has included:

VTI
MSFT
BRK.B
GOOG / GOOGL — one Alphabet issuer seat, do not double count
LLY
NVDA
TSM
GEV
ETN
AVGO
RTX
CB
UBER
WMB
NEM

Also preserve any permanent foundation-review names recorded in Core_Roster, including MDT and HUBB
unless governance has subsequently changed them.

Core membership does NOT mean BUY.

Each core name must still compete for the next dollar.

Core removal/demotion or promotion requires an explicit governance proposal and operator approval. Do
not silently change permanent membership.

================================================================
3. LIFETIME CORE HUNT UNIVERSE
================================================================

Load the persistent Lifetime_Core_Hunt tab in AXIOM Brain first.

Use the following 97-symbol universe as the seeded persistent hunting ground:

SPY, QQQ, SCHD, NVDA, TSM, AVGO, ASX, CDNS, ANET, VRT,
GEV, PWR, HOOD, ALAB, LRCX, VTI, ETN, HPE, FCX, RTX,
LLY, WMB, CB, NEM, CCJ, UBER, IONQ, EMBJ, LFST, FRO,
BRK.B, MSFT, JPM, XOM, MRVL, FORM, LITE, WDC, MU, SNDK,
ATEN, FN, GLW, CAMT, SNPS, COHR, VIAV, DRAM, CSCO, ON,
AMKR, STX, SMH, MWA, SGOV, AR, EQIX, DLR, RRC, OKLO,
POWL, VST, NU, CNX, NEE, STRL, MPWR, AMAT, BKSY, XYL,
GTLB, CEG, GNRC, FIX, EME, ASML, TLN, MWH, BWXT, HII,
MTZ, MIR, LTRX, IREN, TSSI, HIMS, SOFI, AAON, AMPX, SMR,
GOOGL, QCOM, XLE, URA, AMZN, META, SPCX

IMPORTANT:

This is a HUNT UNIVERSE, not a 97-stock portfolio.

Do not treat every member as core.

Do not mechanically buy the highest scanner score.

Do not treat the legacy "OQ Lifetime Core" score as structural business quality.

Treat the uploaded technical fields such as:
- OQ Lifetime Core score
- 4H trend
- OmniQuant Entry
- 5M Smart Entry
- entry zone
- stop
- TP1
- TP2

as technical/attention evidence whose freshness must be checked before use.

The original CSV snapshot is historical provenance. Never assume its prices or levels are currently
executable.

================================================================
4. SOURCE AND SYSTEM HEALTH — RUN FIRST
================================================================

Before evaluating stocks, determine which resources are ACTUALLY available and fresh.

Check, where exposed:

- Google Drive
- Gmail / trading Gmail
- AXIOM Brain
- AXIOM News Intelligence & Opportunity Engine
- OmniQuant Scanner Feed & Directive Control Plane
- Trader Brain historical memory
- company investor-relations sources
- SEC / EDGAR
- Nasdaq / NYSE / relevant exchanges
- regulators and official government sources
- current web/news

- Reuters and other high-quality independent reporting
- current market/quote data
- Alpaca research market data if exposed
- authoritative brokerage/account truth if exposed
- economic/Fed calendar
- options data if options become materially relevant
- sector / industry / peer information
- any other exposed resource that materially improves the decision

Do not omit a useful source merely because I did not specifically mention it.

Report material source failures.

A tool appearing in a document does not prove current access.

================================================================
5. ACCOUNT TRUTH
================================================================

Before giving position size or claiming available deployable capital, establish CURRENT authoritative
account truth if accessible.

Determine:
- equity
- settled cash
- buying power
- current positions
- average costs
- open orders
- concentration
- realized/unrealized exposure
- margin status if applicable

Use the designated authoritative brokerage/account source.

Do not infer current holdings from:
- Gmail
- old Drive ledgers
- research notes
- prior chat
- scanner feeds
- historical screenshots
- model portfolios

If current account truth is unavailable:

DO NOT fabricate a share count.

Instead provide:
Position Size = Allowed Dollar Risk / (Entry - Stop)

and clearly identify what account information is missing.

This workflow is for MANUAL ENTRY DIRECTIVES ONLY.

DO NOT submit, cancel, replace, or modify brokerage orders.

================================================================
6. GMAIL NEWS INGESTION — MANDATORY
================================================================

Search trading Gmail aggressively for NEW or materially changed intelligence.

Do not search only for the apparent leading ticker.

Scan the wider feed for:
- company IR

- SEC alerts
- earnings
- guidance changes
- analyst actions
- Finviz alerts
- Thinkorswim alerts
- Nasdaq alerts
- exchange notices
- regulatory developments
- financing
- M&A
- contracts
- customer wins/losses
- supply agreements
- capacity expansion
- capex
- product launches
- legal matters
- geopolitical developments
- energy developments
- macro developments
- industry read-throughs
- unusual sector/cycle changes

Deduplicate repeated headlines.

Treat Gmail as INTELLIGENCE / DISCOVERY, not automatic truth.

For any consequential event:

1. identify the original claim
2. identify the original source
3. seek primary evidence
4. independently corroborate where material
5. search for the strongest contradiction
6. establish timestamps
7. determine whether the information is new or already priced
8. determine affected companies/industries
9. build the causal chain
10. check price/volume confirmation

Use:

EVENT
→ ECONOMIC EFFECT
→ INDUSTRY EFFECT
→ BENEFICIARIES / LOSERS
→ PORTFOLIO CANDIDATES
→ PRICE CONFIRMATION
→ ENTRY READINESS

Do not confuse an exciting headline with an investable catalyst.

================================================================
7. WRITE NEWS INTELLIGENCE TO THE PROPER DRIVE
================================================================

Use:

AXIOM News Intelligence & Opportunity Engine

for governed news/event intelligence.

As applicable, update the proper existing areas for:
- source health
- raw intake
- event clustering
- verification

- contradictions
- market calendar
- cycle state
- correlation relationships
- causal chains
- price confirmation
- opportunity discovery
- opportunity queue
- state changes
- outcome learning
- run audit
- Brain handoff

Do not duplicate the same logical event repeatedly.

Preserve provenance and timestamps.

Only send actionable/relevant intelligence forward to AXIOM Brain.

================================================================
8. MACRO / MARKET PERMISSION
================================================================

Establish market permission BEFORE selecting the trade.

Classify:

GREEN
SELECTIVE GREEN
YELLOW
RED
BLACKOUT
UNKNOWN

Evaluate whatever is relevant now, including:

- SPY
- QQQ
- IWM
- major index futures
- VIX / volatility
- Treasury yields
- rate expectations
- USD
- oil / energy
- credit conditions
- breadth
- advance/decline behavior
- sector leadership
- semiconductor leadership
- AI-capex complex
- power/grid complex
- financials
- healthcare
- defense
- nuclear
- commodities
- major scheduled economic events
- FOMC
- CPI/PPI/jobs
- earnings
- geopolitical risk
- liquidity conditions

Determine:

- Is the market allowing aggressive deployment?
- Is only selective deployment permitted?
- Is the best action to hold cash?

- Which factors are being rewarded?
- Which factors are failing?
- What common-failure cluster could hurt several candidates simultaneously?

CASH / SGOV / WAIT is always a legitimate competitor.

================================================================
9. THREE SEPARATE SCORES — NEVER COLLAPSE THEM
================================================================

For serious candidates maintain three separate judgments:

A. STRUCTURAL CORE QUALITY — slow-moving

Evaluate:
- durable business quality
- moat / competitive position
- earnings quality
- free cash flow
- revenue and EPS runway
- balance sheet
- survivability
- industry structure
- management/capital allocation
- secular demand
- valuation
- expected return
- competitive threats
- regulatory threats
- technological disruption
- permanent-loss risk

B. PORTFOLIO COMPETITION SCORE — medium-moving

Evaluate:
- expected forward return
- downside
- role in portfolio
- overlap with current positions
- correlation
- factor exposure
- concentration
- common-failure risk
- opportunity cost
- cash hurdle
- alternatives
- whether it deserves THE NEXT DOLLAR

C. ENTRY READINESS — fast-moving

Evaluate:
- daily trend
- 4H trend
- major moving averages
- EMA structure
- RSI
- MACD where useful
- ATR
- VWAP
- volume
- RVOL
- breakout structure
- controlled pullback structure
- support/resistance
- gap behavior
- liquidity
- spread
- extension
- opening range
- sector confirmation

- market confirmation
- catalyst timing
- 5-minute precision only after the higher-timeframe setup qualifies

A great company may be a bad buy today.

A technically strong chart may be a weak long-term business.

Keep these distinctions explicit.

================================================================
10. LIFETIME CORE SCREENING PROCESS
================================================================

Do NOT perform identical deep research on 97 names every run.

Use a funnel.

STAGE 1 — FAST SCREEN ALL 97

Use:
- current catalyst change
- technical state
- 4H/daily trend
- liquidity
- abnormal volume
- relative strength
- sector strength
- portfolio role
- material contradiction
- current valuation/context where rapidly available

Identify only the names with meaningful changes or attractive current conditions.

STAGE 2 — DEEP REVIEW FINALISTS

Deep-underwrite approximately the best 5-10 serious candidates using:
- primary sources
- filings
- current news
- Gmail
- competitors
- supply chain
- customers
- valuation
- analyst expectations where useful
- technical structure
- catalyst timeline
- contradictions
- causal chains

STAGE 3 — FINAL CHAMPIONSHIP

Compete:
- permanent core repeat-buys
- current holdings/adds
- re-entry candidates
- best Lifetime Core Hunt names
- Challenger Bench
- newly discovered outside opportunities if allowed by governance
- CASH / SGOV / WAIT

The winner must beat cash on expected risk-adjusted opportunity.

================================================================
11. OUTSIDE-UNIVERSE DISCOVERY
================================================================

Do not become blind to a better opportunity just because it is not on the 97-name list.

After reviewing the persistent Lifetime Hunt universe, run governed open-universe discovery using:
- Gmail
- scanners
- news
- primary evidence
- causal chains
- sector/peer relationships

Outside names begin as DISCOVERY.

They cannot silently enter permanent core.

If an outside name is materially superior, place it on the Challenger Bench / opportunity queue and
explain why.

================================================================
12. SCANNER GOVERNANCE
================================================================

Read the OmniQuant Scanner Feed & Directive Control Plane when available.

Scanner results are ATTENTION FLAGS only.

A high scanner score does NOT authorize a trade.

Use scanner information to identify:
- breakouts
- acceleration
- pullbacks
- unusual RVOL
- trend strength
- sector clusters
- new price confirmation

Then independently verify:
- business/catalyst
- market regime
- liquidity
- higher-timeframe structure
- portfolio fit
- entry quality

Do not chase simply because a name ranks #1 on the scanner.

================================================================
13. AGGRESSIVE ACCOUNT-GROWTH LOGIC
================================================================

The goal is aggressive COMPOUNDING, not aggressive turnover.

Favor situations where several independent advantages converge:

- strong business or clearly defined asymmetric thesis
- material catalyst or durable secular mechanism
- favorable market/sector regime
- improving or strong relative strength
- attractive entry location
- identifiable invalidation
- good liquidity
- favorable reward/risk
- portfolio fit
- limited same-reason failure exposure

Concentrate research on the highest expected-return opportunities.

Do not force diversification merely to own more names.

Do not force a trade because cash exists.

Do not average down merely because price is lower.

Do not chase vertical moves.

Require a new thesis/entry review after material gaps or news.

The highest-conviction trade should have BOTH:
QUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY
and
QUALITY OF ENTRY.

================================================================
14. FINALISTS MUST FACE A CONTRADICTION TEST
================================================================

For each finalist ask:

What is the strongest reason we are wrong?

Search specifically for:
- deteriorating fundamentals
- valuation excess
- customer concentration
- competitive displacement
- legal/regulatory risk
- dilution
- debt
- insider selling where material
- cyclical peak risk
- supply constraints
- demand destruction
- capex risk
- geopolitical dependence
- commodity exposure
- execution failures
- accounting quality
- stale catalyst
- crowded positioning
- technical distribution

Do not bury contradictory evidence.

================================================================
15. MANUAL ENTRY ENGINE
================================================================

After selecting the best underlying, produce a MANUAL directive.

Refresh price immediately before setting levels.

Do not use stale CSV levels as executable levels.

Use daily + 4H context first.

Use the 5-minute chart for precision only when appropriate.

For the winner provide:

TICKER:
COMPANY:
DIRECTIVE:

BUY / ADD / HOLD / TRIM / EXIT / CASH-WAIT

INSTRUMENT:
Shares by default.
Only compare options if they are clearly superior for the thesis, liquidity, defined risk, time
horizon, and account constraints.

TIMEFRAME:
Intraday / swing / position / long-term accumulation

CURRENT PRICE:
Source + timestamp

CATALYST:
What actually matters now

STRUCTURAL THESIS:
Why this can compound or rerate

WHY NOW:
Why the timing is superior to waiting

MARKET / SECTOR CONFIRMATION:

ENTRY TRIGGER:
The actual condition that must occur

STARTER ENTRY ZONE:

PREFERRED ENTRY ZONE:

BREAKOUT ENTRY:
If applicable

NO-CHASE LEVEL:
Price/location beyond which the expected value deteriorates

STOP / RISK INVALIDATION:
Technical and thesis invalidation separately when different

TARGET 1:

TARGET 2:

TRAIL / MANAGEMENT PLAN:

EXPECTED R:R TO TP1:

EXPECTED R:R TO TP2:

POSITION SIZE:
Use current account truth and planned dollar risk.
If account truth is unavailable, give the exact sizing formula.

PLANNED DOLLAR RISK:

PORTFOLIO ROLE:

COMMON-FAILURE EXPOSURE:

WHAT WOULD MAKE ME CANCEL THE TRADE BEFORE ENTRY:

WHAT WOULD MAKE ME EXIT AFTER ENTRY:

EVIDENCE CONFIDENCE:
HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW

EXECUTION DATA:
FRESH / DEGRADED / STALE / UNKNOWN

TECHNICAL STATE:
WAIT / SETUP / ARMED / FIRE

AXIOM STATE:

MANUAL ACTION:
State exactly what I should watch/do manually.

================================================================
16. DO NOT GIVE ME FIVE "BEST" TRADES
================================================================

Pinpoint ONE winner.

Also identify:
#2 backup
#3 backup

But the final directive must answer:

"IF I CAN DEPLOY ONLY ONE NEW BLOCK OF CAPITAL, WHERE DOES IT GO?"

If nothing earns deployment:

CHAMPION = CASH / WAIT

Do not lower standards merely to provide a ticker.

================================================================
17. CORE SEAT DEFENSE
================================================================

Show whether current permanent-core names still deserve their strategic seats.

Separate:

CORE MEMBERSHIP
from
BUY-NOW STATUS.

Possible conclusions:

LOCKED CORE — ADD CANDIDATE
LOCKED CORE — HOLD / WAIT
LOCKED CORE — THESIS REVIEW
CORE DEMOTION PROPOSAL
PERMANENT FOUNDATION REVIEW
CHALLENGER
SATELLITE
DIAGNOSTIC
REJECTED / BLOCKED

Do not alter Core_Roster merely because a challenger wins today's next-dollar competition.

================================================================
18. CORE PROMOTION GOVERNANCE
================================================================

A Hunt candidate can progress:

LIFETIME HUNT
→ RESEARCH_QUALIFIED
→ CORE CANDIDATE
→ CORE PROMOTION PROPOSAL
→ OPERATOR APPROVAL
→ PERMANENT CORE

Buying a Hunt name does not promote it.

A high technical score does not promote it.

Promotion requires durable strategic evidence, expected-return advantage, portfolio role,
diversification value, common-failure analysis, and explicit approval.

================================================================
19. WRITE RESULTS BACK TO AXIOM BRAIN
================================================================

When Drive write access is available, update the appropriate existing sections of:

AXIOM Brain — Memory & Portfolio Ledger

Use the proper tabs according to scope:

System_Health
- current source/tool health and material failures

Market_State
- market permission/regime and material changes

Evidence_Memory
- durable verified evidence and contradictions

Lifetime_Core_Hunt
- current state of relevant members
- preserve historical lineage
- do not overwrite prior snapshot provenance

Challenger_Bench
- serious research-qualified challengers

Portfolio_Competition
- current next-dollar rankings

State_Changes
- only material changes

Run_Memory
- audit of this run and its conclusion

Promotion_Control
- only genuine core promotion/demotion proposals

Core_Roster
- DO NOT silently alter
- membership change requires explicit operator approval

AccountTruth / Positions
- only use appropriately scoped authoritative account evidence

Do not write stale assumptions as verified truth.

Do not overwrite contradictory history simply because the current opinion changed.

================================================================
20. LEGACY DRIVE BOUNDARY

================================================================

Use legacy OmniQuant / Trader Brain / scanner / strategy files for:
- history
- lineage
- prior theses
- prior levels
- old catalysts
- strategy lessons
- contradictions
- comparison

Do NOT silently rewrite legacy ledgers unless the specific workflow explicitly designates that file
writable.

AXIOM is the governance layer.

================================================================
21. REQUIRED FINAL REPORT
================================================================

Return the report in this exact general order:

A. SYSTEM / SOURCE HEALTH
Briefly show what was actually accessible and what was not.

B. ACCOUNT TRUTH
Current capital/positions if authoritative and fresh.

C. MARKET PERMISSION
GREEN / SELECTIVE GREEN / YELLOW / RED / BLACKOUT / UNKNOWN
Explain why.

D. NEWS & CATALYST INTELLIGENCE
Only material changes.
Separate verified facts from unverified leads.

E. PERMANENT CORE BOARD
Identify:
- strongest current repeat-buy core
- weakest core thesis
- core names near entry
- core names blocked by timing

F. LIFETIME CORE HUNT
Show the important movers/changes from the 97-name universe.

G. FINAL CHAMPIONSHIP
Rank at minimum:
1. best use of capital
2. runner-up
3. third place
4. CASH/WAIT position in competition

H. SINGLE CHAMPION
State one ticker or CASH.

I. MANUAL ENTRY DIRECTIVE
Give the complete execution plan described above.

J. WHAT WOULD CHANGE THE DECISION
List the exact market/ticker conditions that would replace the champion.

K. DRIVE WRITE LOG
State exactly what was written to:
- AXIOM News Intelligence & Opportunity Engine
- AXIOM Brain

If no write access existed, say so.

L. FINAL ONE-LINE DIRECTIVE
Example structure:

DIRECTIVE: WAIT FOR TSM 4H SUPPORT HOLD + 5M VWAP RECLAIM; MANUAL BUY ONLY INSIDE X–Y WITH STOP Z;
OTHERWISE CASH.

or

DIRECTIVE: NO-TRADE — CASH REMAINS CHAMPION UNTIL [specific condition].

================================================================
22. BEHAVIOR RULES
================================================================

Do not use prediction theater.

Do not say a trade is guaranteed or foolproof.

Do not confuse scanner attention with evidence.

Do not confuse a good company with a good entry.

Do not confuse a catalyst headline with a verified causal mechanism.

Do not use delayed data as though it were execution-quality data.

Do not fabricate account balances, holdings, prices, spreads, volume, news, options chains, filings,
or source access.

Do not force activity.

Do not give vague "keep an eye on it" conclusions.

Give concrete directives and concrete invalidation.

When evidence conflicts, show the conflict and make a decision.

When data is insufficient, fail closed.

When one candidate clearly dominates, say so.

When CASH dominates, say so.

This is a manual-entry decision-support workflow. No broker actions are authorized by this command.

BEGIN THE COMPLETE RUN NOW.