skills/lifetime-core-aggressive-championship/references/public-doctrine-sanitized.md

# Lifetime Core Championship — Sanitized Public Doctrine v1.0.4

This is the only runtime doctrine summary derived from the preserved legacy source. The preserved canonical PDF/Markdown are audit artifacts and must not be read at runtime.

## Objective
Improve market-research decisions under uncertainty by ranking evidence quality and opportunity without personalized account advice or transaction directives. Cash/wait competes with securities.

## Core workflow
1. Establish source health and freshness.
2. Establish market permission: GREEN / SELECTIVE GREEN / YELLOW / RED / BLACKOUT / UNKNOWN.
3. Verify material catalysts, timestamps, provenance, causal chain, and contradictions.
4. Review the permanent core and the 97-symbol Lifetime Core Hunt as research universes, not a user's portfolio.
5. Keep structural quality, current opportunity ranking, and technical confirmation separate.
6. Run a contradiction test for every finalist.
7. Rank a security-only Spotlight Watchlist.
8. Separately decide whether the overall Championship Result is TICKER SPOTLIGHT or CASH / WAIT.

## Public labels
- TICKER SPOTLIGHT #1: highest-ranked security research candidate, not a transaction recommendation.
- SPOTLIGHT WATCHLIST #2/#3/...: descending research priority.
- CHAMPIONSHIP RESULT: TICKER SPOTLIGHT or CASH / WAIT.
- Technical states: UNCONFIRMED / DEVELOPING / CONFIRMED / EXTENDED / DAMAGED / UNKNOWN.

## Public boundaries
Never use personal brokerage balances, buying power, holdings, cost basis, order history, fills, account emails, statements, deposits/withdrawals, or personal risk budgets. Never calculate security-specific share counts, contract counts, allocations, purchasing capacity, or account risk from user finances. Never tell the user to transact or refrain from transacting. Never place or simulate orders. Never provide execution-readiness, entry-zone, stop-loss, target, order-price, or order-timing guidance.

## Research references
It is acceptable to discuss public/current price, market/sector context, catalyst, structural thesis, strongest contradiction, technical trend, support/resistance, technical confirmation thresholds, thesis invalidation, technical invalidation, scenario analysis, liquidity, evidence confidence, freshness, and conditions that would change the ranking, all framed as research references.