← Files VeraARCHIVED FILE
modules/deep-research-validator/assets/review-workbench-adapter.json
8.11 KB · Oct 3, 2026 · 06:30 UTC
{
"schemaVersion": "1.0",
"plugin": "deep-research-validator",
"title": "Answer Validation Review",
"reviewTitle": "Source Identity, Support, Reasoning, And Judgment Review",
"queueTitle": "Claims",
"detailTitle": "Claim Evidence",
"detailMode": "claim-desk",
"detailHelp": "Review source identity, semantic support, reasoning, issue treatment, and professional-judgment limits separately before deciding.",
"detailGroups": [
{
"title": "Claim",
"variant": "prose",
"fields": [
"claim",
"claim_text",
"title"
],
"empty": "No claim text."
},
{
"title": "Source Identity & Access",
"variant": "source",
"fields": [
"source_checks",
"mechanical_source_observations"
],
"empty": "No source-identity assessment."
},
{
"title": "Semantic Source Support",
"variant": "source",
"fields": [
"support"
],
"empty": "No source-support fields."
},
{
"title": "Reasoning",
"variant": "finding",
"fields": [
"reasoning"
],
"empty": "No reasoning assessment."
},
{
"title": "Professional Judgment",
"variant": "finding",
"fields": [
"professional_judgment"
],
"empty": "No professional-judgment assessment."
},
{
"title": "Issues & Treatment",
"variant": "finding",
"fields": [
"issues",
"proposed_fix"
],
"empty": "No finding fields."
},
{
"title": "Disposition",
"variant": "finding",
"fields": [
"disposition",
"reviewer_action"
],
"empty": "No disposition."
}
],
"panels": [
"Claim",
"Source identity & access",
"Semantic source support",
"Reasoning",
"Professional judgment",
"Issues & treatment",
"Disposition"
],
"localized": {
"es": {
"title": "Revisi\u00f3n de validaci\u00f3n de respuestas",
"reviewTitle": "Revisi\u00f3n de fuentes, razonamiento y juicio profesional",
"queueTitle": "Afirmaciones",
"detailTitle": "Evidencia de la afirmaci\u00f3n",
"detailHelp": "Revise por separado el respaldo de las fuentes, el razonamiento y los l\u00edmites del juicio profesional.",
"search": "Buscar afirmaci\u00f3n, cita, fuente, gravedad, salida"
},
"it": {
"title": "Revisione validazione risposta",
"reviewTitle": "Revisione fonti, ragionamento e giudizio professionale",
"queueTitle": "Claim",
"detailTitle": "Evidenza claim",
"detailHelp": "Rivedi separatamente supporto delle fonti, ragionamento e limiti del giudizio professionale.",
"search": "Cerca claim, citazione, fonte, severita, output"
},
"fr": {
"title": "Revue de validation de r\u00e9ponse",
"reviewTitle": "Revue des sources, du raisonnement et du jugement professionnel",
"queueTitle": "Assertions",
"detailTitle": "Preuve de l'assertion",
"detailHelp": "Examinez s\u00e9par\u00e9ment le support des sources, le raisonnement et les limites du jugement professionnel.",
"search": "Chercher assertion, citation, source, severite, sortie"
},
"de": {
"title": "Review der Antwortvalidierung",
"reviewTitle": "Quellen-, Begr\u00fcndungs- und Ermessensreview",
"queueTitle": "Aussagen",
"detailTitle": "Nachweis zur Aussage",
"detailHelp": "Quellenst\u00fctzung, Begr\u00fcndung und professionellen Ermessensspielraum getrennt pr\u00fcfen.",
"search": "Aussage, Zitat, Quelle, Schweregrad, Ausgabe suchen"
}
},
"saveTool": "save_deep_research_decisions",
"applyTool": "apply_deep_research_decisions",
"widgetType": "deep_research_review",
"demo": {
"review_type": "answer_validation_review",
"items": [
{
"id": "claim-1",
"item_type": "supported_claim",
"title": "Claim 4: tax residence follows center of vital interests",
"source_path": "answer.md",
"output_path": "claims_review.json",
"allowed_actions": [
"accept",
"reject",
"edit",
"mark_unclear",
"skip"
],
"recommended_action": "mark_unclear",
"data": {
"claim_text": "Residence follows the taxpayer's center of vital interests.",
"source_checks": [
{
"source_ref": "source-001",
"identity_status": "matches_cited_source",
"identity_analysis": "The cited commentary and captured source are the same instrument.",
"authority_relation": "secondary_commentary",
"official_text_access": "not_applicable",
"text_fidelity": "not_applicable",
"access_analysis": "The claim relies on commentary rather than a reproduced primary text.",
"limitations": [],
"cited_passage": "centre of vital interests"
}
],
"support": {
"status": "partially_supported",
"analysis": "The passage supports treaty residence tie-breaker logic, not domestic filing deadlines."
},
"reasoning": {
"status": "partially_sound",
"analysis": "The treaty inference follows, but the answer extends it to an unsupported domestic deadline.",
"supported_premises": [
"Treaty tie-breaker premise"
],
"missing_premises": [
"Domestic filing deadline rule"
]
},
"professional_judgment": {
"status": "professional_judgment_required",
"analysis": "Applying the tie-breaker requires a fact-sensitive assessment.",
"factors": [
"Personal relations",
"Economic relations"
],
"alternative_interpretations": [
"Either state may be the centre of vital interests"
]
},
"issues": [
{
"type": "partial_or_overbroad_support",
"explanation": "The answer extends beyond the source.",
"treatment_action": "narrow_claim",
"treatment_status": "proposed",
"treatment_explanation": "Limit the claim to the treaty tie-breaker."
}
],
"disposition": {
"status": "revise",
"analysis": "Narrow the claim.",
"revised_claim": "Treaty residence may turn on the centre of vital interests."
},
"reviewer_action": "edit",
"status": "needs_evidence",
"severity": "medium",
"review_notes": "The citation supports treaty tie-breaker logic but not local filing deadlines.",
"claim_index": 4,
"target_artifact": "claims_review.json",
"target_records_key": "claims",
"target_id_field": "claim_index",
"target_record_id": "4",
"target_field": "proposed_fix",
"edit_hint": "Editing this claim writes the reviewer correction to proposed_fix in claims_review.json."
},
"evidence": [
{
"kind": "answer_validation_assessment",
"support": {
"status": "partially_supported"
},
"reasoning": {
"status": "partially_sound"
},
"professional_judgment": {
"status": "professional_judgment_required"
}
}
]
},
{
"id": "source-1",
"item_type": "source_limit",
"title": "Source relevance: OECD Commentary",
"source_path": "sources/oecd-commentary.txt",
"output_path": "source_inventory.json",
"allowed_actions": [
"accept",
"edit",
"mark_unclear",
"skip"
],
"recommended_action": "accept",
"data": {
"source_title": "OECD Model Tax Convention Commentary",
"status": "relevant",
"source_url": "https://www.oecd.org/"
},
"evidence": [
{
"kind": "source_inventory",
"relevance": "high"
}
]
}
]
}
}
SHA-256: 5f295f506e378fee83909433dff20fe940ed9b5b0688fb7018d26fbff16535f8