skills/writing-strategy/references/controversy_analysis_proposal.md

# Controversy → Analysis → Proposal / 논란 → 다각도 분석 → 제안

- English name: Controversy → Analysis → Proposal
- Korean name: 논란 → 다각도 분석 → 제안
- Selection category: debate
- Use when: Use when the topic is contested and requires balanced analysis before a proposal.
- Avoid when: Avoid when the writer has no room for opposing views.

## Writing Pattern

**Use a fixed flow**

- Raise the problem and introduce the controversy
- Analyze positions and perspectives
- Proposal and conclusion
- In your multi-angle analysis, include pro/cons, stakeholder views, social/economic impact, and data-driven perspectives.

**Each major section should include**

- Section heading
- Core paragraph purpose (1–2 sentences)
- Prioritize objective information, logical comparisons, and fact-based interpretation over emotional claims.

## Example Writing Outline

1. **How the Debate Started**: Debate is heating up over AI adoption—between fears of job loss and hopes for productivity gains. (Controversy)
2. **Perspective 1 — The Positive View**: AI reduces repetitive tasks and creates opportunities to focus on higher-value work. (Analysis)
3. **Perspective 2 — The Negative View**: In the near term, job displacement and reskilling costs can be significant. (Analysis)
4. **Perspective 3 — Policy Considerations**: Without more flexible labor markets and stronger safety nets, disruption could intensify. (Analysis)
5. **Proposal and Conclusion**: Since AI adoption is inevitable, governments and companies should combine phased rollout with role-transition programs. (Proposal)

## Writing Notes

- When explaining the background, provide fact-based context.
- Keep the analysis balanced and objective; avoid bias toward any single viewpoint.
- Make the proposal a clear, actionable synthesis of the analysis.
- Neutral facilitation is fine—use prompts that broaden reader thinking.