← Files Compound WritingARCHIVED FILE
skills/cw-tracks/SKILL.md
4.71 KB · Oct 3, 2026 · 06:35 UTC
--- name: cw-tracks description: Finds where the writing shows its tracks—scaffolding, throat-clearing, process narration, and arrival sequences that should be erased now that the destination is clear. --- # Tracks ## Purpose Find where the writing shows its tracks. Annie Dillard: "Process is nothing; erase your tracks." This skill hunts for the scaffolding still visible in a draft—the exploratory thinking, the arrival sequences, the "how I got here" that helped the writer but slows the reader. Use this when: - A draft reads like a journey log instead of a destination - You can see the writer thinking on the page - Sections narrate the process of figuring something out rather than presenting what was found - The piece feels like it's warming up for too long before it arrives - You've revised heavily and want to check for leftover scaffolding ## Invocation - `/cw-tracks [text]` — Find the tracks in the provided text - `/cw-tracks` — System asks "What needs its tracks erased?" - Works on selection if provided, asks if not ## Track Types | Track | What It Looks Like | Why It Should Go | |-------|-------------------|------------------| | **The Arrival Sequence** | "After much research, I realized..." "It took me a while to see that..." | The reader doesn't need your travel itinerary. Start where you landed. | | **The Scaffolding** | Transitional paragraphs that connect old thinking to new thinking. | These helped you build the argument. The argument can stand without them now. | | **The Thinking-Out-Loud** | "What if we consider..." "One might wonder..." "This raises the question..." | You already answered the question. Just give the answer. | | **The Hedge Trail** | "It seems like," "I think," "perhaps," "it's possible that" — accumulated over drafts. | Hedges multiply during revision. Most can go once you know what you believe. | | **The Deleted Argument's Ghost** | A rebuttal to a point no longer in the piece. A transition to a section that was cut. | Old structure leaves phantom limbs. Find and amputate them. | | **The Discovery Narration** | "I didn't expect to find..." "Surprisingly..." "What I learned was..." | The reader experiences discovery through the idea itself, not through being told you discovered it. | | **The Warm-Up** | First 1-3 paragraphs that exist because the writer needed a running start. | Your real opening is buried somewhere in paragraph 3 or 4. | | **The Belt-and-Suspenders** | Making the same point twice in different words, because you weren't sure the first version landed. | Trust your first swing. If it didn't land, fix it—don't repeat it. | ## The Dillard Test For every passage, ask: 1. Is this here for the reader or for the writer? 2. Does this describe the process of thinking, or the thought itself? 3. If I cut this, would the argument still stand? 4. Is this the destination, or the road I took to get there? If the passage is road, not destination—erase the track. ## Output Format ``` ## Track Report **Tracks found:** [count] **Severity:** [Light — a few fingerprints / Moderate — scaffolding visible / Heavy — the draft reads like a process log] --- ### The Tracks 1. **[Track type]** — [Location/quote] Why it's showing: [Brief explanation] Erase it by: [Specific suggestion] 2. **[Track type]** — [Location/quote] Why it's showing: [Brief explanation] Erase it by: [Specific suggestion] [Continue for each track found] --- ### The Warm-Up Check **Does the real piece start where the draft starts?** [Yes / No — the piece actually begins at: "[quote from where the real opening lives]"] --- ### The Clean Version [Rewrite of the most track-heavy section with tracks erased] --- **What changed:** - [How erasing tracks improved the passage] Is the path clear now, or are there tracks I missed? ``` ## Principles - **Process is nothing; erase your tracks** — The reader should experience the destination, not the journey you took to find it. - **The writer's discovery is not the reader's discovery** — You found the insight by wandering. The reader should find it by being led. - **Scaffolding is for building, not for living in** — Once the structure stands, take down the scaffolding. - **Trust arrival** — If you've arrived at a strong point, you don't need to narrate the arrival. - **Revision leaves residue** — Every round of revision can leave traces of earlier versions. The last pass should clean the glass. ## The Box Canyon Dillard describes writing as following a path into a box canyon—you dispatch reports from new territory. The reports are the writing. The path you took to get there is not. If your draft reads like a trail map, you're publishing the wrong thing. ## Lessons [Skill-specific lessons will be added here as they're captured]
SHA-256: 1b188d1e803ec434c3c69ef757c5152748f5ee42df1c7640d6b62fa6acbf1dbe