← Files Chronograph LPARCHIVED FILE
skills/chronograph-gp-meeting-prep/references/report-review-checklist.md
3.23 KB · Oct 4, 2026 · 12:10 UTC
# Report Review Checklist Use this checklist when reviewing a GP reporting package or Chronograph report-derived context for LP meeting prep. ## Source Coverage - Identify which materials are available, whether from Chronograph or provided by the LP. - When Chronograph document search is available, use it to review the captured reporting package, including the narrative and commentary it contains, not just the summary tables. - Ask the LP to provide any document the meeting needs that isn't in the connected context. ## Fund-Level Review - Confirm reporting period, as-of date, currency, and units. - Lead with the GP-reported figures and cite their source document where available: gross IRR and MOIC, cost, realized value, and unrealized value, plus their movement versus the prior period. - Review NAV, unfunded, contributions, distributions, and total exposure versus the prior period, and check TVPI, DPI, RVPI, and net IRR movement as the LP's bottom-line return. - Distinguish gross from net throughout, and look for changes in recallable amounts and other cost or value items. - Flag values that do not reconcile or appear to use different dates or definitions. ## Cashflow Review - Identify large calls, distributions, or recallable distributions. - Ask whether calls were for new investments, follow-ons, fees, expenses, or reserves if not explained. - Ask what drove distributions: exits, partial sales, dividends, recapitalizations, or other activity. - Distinguish distributions funded by realized exits from those financed by a NAV facility or subscription line. - Compare cashflow timing to the fund's age, strategy, and prior deployment pace. ## Valuation Review - Identify material write-ups and write-downs. - Look for stale marks, large unchanged values, and methodology changes. - Flag any shift in valuation basis, such as a move from market comparables toward cost, and ask what prompted it. - Where marks drive the discussion, ask whether a written valuation policy with defined write-down triggers supports them. - Check whether valuation changes are concentrated in a few holdings. - Ask for support where valuation movement lacks KPI or transaction context. ## Portfolio Review - Identify top holdings and concentration by company, sector, geography, and fund exposure where available. - Review new investments, exits, partial realizations, and follow-on investments. - Review company KPI profile changes: revenue, EBITDA, leverage, customer metrics, or other reported operating KPIs. - Flag portfolio companies with worsening KPIs but unchanged or increasing marks. - Flag positive KPI movement that is not reflected in valuation or manager commentary. ## Reporting Quality Review - Note missing explanations for material performance, valuation, or cashflow movement. - Note inconsistent metric names, definitions, periods, currency, or scale. - Note changed reporting format or missing tables compared with prior periods. - Note where the GP report gives conclusions without supporting detail. ## Meeting Output - Lead with the highest-priority issues, not a full data dump. - Convert gaps into specific GP questions. - Separate urgent meeting questions from follow-up document requests. - Include source notes so the LP can trace every quantitative point.
SHA-256: b332b9de408803cd0b7b5504fa70508e1ff344226b1a4c30b5d20e6ceb34faf4