skills/presenza-digitale-studio/references/lucia-lawyer-profile.md

# Lucia lawyer profile · digital presence

This profile adapts the shared professional-studio website machinery to Lucia.
It changes professional identity, public-claim review, and confidentiality
requirements. Evidence snapshots, site briefs, implementation, mechanical
validation, desktop and phone review, preview controls, exact package binding,
and publication receipts remain canonical and shared with Vera.

## Professional owner

The lawyer owns the truth of the professional title, firm identity, bar
membership, services, qualifications, specializations, team, locations,
contact details, legal notices, and publication decision. Lucia may propose
structure, wording, typography, spacing, restrained color, and page geometry,
but proposals remain visibly reviewable until accepted.

For Lucia runs:

- read references to the `commercialista` in the shared contract as the lawyer
  or expressly authorized law-firm reviewer;
- read references to `Vera` as the host assistant `Lucia` when they concern
  proposed copy, visual identity, user-facing labels, review, or publication;
- preserve mechanically named legacy Sites binding files when schemas require
  them; do not expose those filenames as Lucia's public product identity;
- preserve the canonical internal provenance value `vera_default_proposal` for
  assistant-originated conventions, but present it to the lawyer as a Lucia
  proposal and never as observed studio history or a Vera-branded deliverable.

## Verified public identity

Require evidence before publishing the lawyer's professional title, firm name,
bar membership, organization, services, specializations, qualifications,
roles, locations, people, and contact details. Do not create client names,
assisted-party names, testimonials, case studies, results, rankings, comparative
claims, success rates, guarantees, awards, or social proof.

Public information must remain truthful, transparent, correct, non-equivocal,
non-misleading, non-denigratory, non-suggestive, and non-comparative. It must
preserve the nature and limits of the professional obligation. Assess these
properties against the exact rendered site and the governing rules at the
reference date; never label the result legally or deontologically compliant
without a separate qualified audit and the lawyer's confirmation.

The current official professional sources to check at the run's reference date
include the Consiglio Nazionale Forense's Codice Deontologico Forense,
particularly the rules on information about professional activity, correct
information, and confidentiality. The lawyer confirms any local bar or
jurisdiction-specific requirements.

## Confidentiality and minimum disclosure

Do not publish client or assisted-party identities, matter facts, legal
strategy, correspondence, draft positions, or information learned through a
mandate. Consent alone does not make a client name suitable for public
professional information. Use only supplied assets and facts explicitly
approved for public use. An unlisted preview is still an external disclosure
and must contain no confidential or unapproved material.

Keep client portals, document exchange, appointment systems, contact forms,
analytics, tracking, maps, third-party embeds, remote executable scripts, and
other visitor-data integrations outside the informational-site run unless the
lawyer explicitly selects a separately scoped privacy, security, and provider
review. Do not invent privacy, cookie, accessibility, or legal notices.

## Publication boundary

The website may explain areas of work and provide general information, but it
must not imply that public content is matter-specific advice or promise an
outcome. Final publication requires the lawyer to accept the exact identity,
claims, responsive captures, package, destination, and any professional-rule
review. Unresolved confidentiality, professional-information, legal-notice, or
visitor-data questions block publication rather than becoming footnote caveats.

## Primary references

- Consiglio Nazionale Forense, Codice Deontologico Forense, art. 17:
  https://codicedeontologico-cnf.it/voci/art-17-cdf-informazione-sullesercizio-dellattivita-professionale/
- Consiglio Nazionale Forense, Codice Deontologico Forense, art. 35:
  https://codicedeontologico-cnf.it/voci/art-35-cdf-dovere-di-corretta-informazione/
- Consiglio Nazionale Forense, decisions and materials on secrecy and
  confidentiality:
  https://codicedeontologico-cnf.it/i-presupposti-del-segreto-e-riserbo-professionale-4/