skills/intelligo-prep-committee-deck/assets/templates/executive-narrative.md

# [Subject Name] — Background Diligence Summary

*Prepared for [Board / Committee] · [Date]*

---

## Summary

We engaged Intelligo to conduct a [report level] background review of [Subject Name], [Role] at [Entity]. The review covered [plain-English description: criminal and civil legal history, regulatory standing, professional and educational background, news coverage].

[1–2 sentences describing what was found at each severity level present. Plain language. State the findings, not a verdict.]

Examples:

- "The review surfaced [N] red flags and [N] yellow flags. The most severe finding was [plain-language description of the underlying finding]."
- "The review found no red or yellow flags. Coverage was complete in [jurisdictions]."

## What we found

[For each red and yellow finding, in plain language, 2 sentences max. State the finding. Avoid acronyms — if you must use one, define it: "OFAC (the US sanctions list)". Never characterize the finding ("major", "concerning") — describe what happened.]

[If no findings: "No red or yellow concerns were identified. The subject's professional and educational history was verified, and no adverse legal, regulatory, or media findings were noted."]

## Confidence

[1 paragraph on how thorough this review was and any limits. Plain language: "This was Intelligo's most comprehensive review level, covering 15 years of records in [jurisdictions]" rather than naming the report level.]

## What the committee may want to ask

1. [Plain-language question tied to a specific finding]
2. [Plain-language question]
3. [Plain-language question]

---

*The full Intelligo report is available on request. This summary captures the findings most relevant to the [committee's] decision; the committee is the body that weighs what the findings mean.*