skills/intelligo-prep-committee-deck/assets/templates/flags-by-severity.md

# [Subject Name] — Flag-by-Flag Review

**Subject:** [Name], [Role] · [Entity]
**Report:** Intelligo L[X] · Coverage: [Jurisdictions]
**Prepared for:** [Risk team / GC] · [Date]

---

## Coverage map

| Category | Checked | Notes |
|----------|---------|-------|
| Legal (civil + criminal) | ✓ | [Federal + state, 15yr] |
| Regulatory (sanctions, OFAC, PEP) | ✓ | |
| Asset (liens, bankruptcy, UCC) | ✓ | |
| Education | ✓ | [Verification level] |
| Employment | ✓ | [Years checked] |
| Media | ✓ | |
| Social media | ✓ / not at this level | |

---

## Red findings

### [Finding title]

- **Severity:** Red
- **Finding:** [What was specifically found — full sentence with context, not just the flag title. Include amounts, parties, dates, what happened.]
- **Source:** [Link + date]
- **Jurisdiction:** [Country / state / county]
- **Date of underlying event:** [When the event happened]
- **Analyst note from Intelligo:** [Verbatim if present; omit section if none]
- **Suggested IC question:** [What to ask, tied to the finding]

[Repeat per red flag. Never include a flag entry without finding text — generic flag titles aren't sufficient.]

---

## Yellow findings

[Same structure as red, more compact. Severity row says "Yellow".]

---

## Information findings

| Severity | Finding | Source |
|----------|---------|--------|
| Info | [Finding text, not just title] | [Source] |

---

## Methodology

[1 paragraph: how Intelligo gathered the data, what the report level means, any consent or jurisdictional limits.]