← Files Horizon ForgeARCHIVED FILE
skills/horizon-forecast/templates/research-plan.md
2.75 KB · Oct 5, 2026 · 18:34 UTC
# Research plan: [topic] ## Decision and scope - User's decision and intended use: - As-of date and information cutoff: - Geography and regional coverage: - Baseline metric, currency/price basis, and market boundaries: - Near-term, primary, and longer-term endpoints: - Definition of substantial expansion and resolution source: - Depth/deliverables and any user constraints: - Assumptions being used while optional clarifications are pending: ## Ordered procedure | Stage | Research question | Method/source targets | Owner | Dependencies | Completion evidence | Status | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | Frame | What exactly are we comparing? | Definitions and reference classes | Director | None | Comparable boundaries and event definition | Pending | | Discover | Which segments deserve deeper work? | Diverse economic-driver scan | Scout/director | Frame | Candidate map and exclusions | Pending | | Establish | What is observed today? | Original datasets and demand/cost records | Specialists | Candidate map | Claim/source ledger | Pending | | Connect | What enables or prevents growth? | Causal/dependency map and regional constraints | Specialists/director | Initial evidence | Material tangents and critical path | Pending | | Quantify | What outcomes fit demand and capacity? | Bottom-up/top-down checks and scenarios | Forecaster/economist | Compatible baseline | Reproducible inputs, outcomes, sensitivities | Pending | | Rate | How do opportunities compare? | Anchored rubrics and confidence | Director | Quantification | Explained scorecards and tiers | Pending | | Challenge | What could reverse the conclusion? | External counterevidence and numerical audit | Independent reviewers | Initial draft | Findings and dispositions | Pending | | Resolve | Which gaps need another pass? | Targeted answer-changing research | Director/specialists | Challenge | Revised results or explicit limitations | Pending | | Deliver | Can the user assess and revisit the forecast? | Final checks and forecast register | Director | Material findings handled | Dossier and update signposts | Pending | ## Agent and evidence protocol List actual available slots, assignments, independent initial estimates, merge ownership, and fallback if tools fail. Specify authoritative source types, critical corroboration needs, geography gaps, and prohibited/inaccessible data. ## Ranking choices and depth allocation Freeze weights, comparison-specific scale bands, shortlist targets, thresholds, and high-value research questions. Define tangent relevance and the stopping convention. Do not change the rubric after seeing results without recording why. ## Completion and departures Update with completed, omitted, and blocked stages; explain material departures from this plan and implications for the final answer.
SHA-256: e6dc92e1c5addd9165e9252f53757860b2313bd0bb43997f5b52cb39ea6b4d2d