← Files Argovance Skill OSARCHIVED FILE
skills/audit-premium-digital-experience/references/report-template.md
2.02 KB · Oct 5, 2026 · 18:35 UTC
# Report Template Adapt depth to the product and available evidence. Omit empty sections only when clearly marked as not applicable. ## Gesamtbewertung - Demonstrated maturity level - Overall score, confidence, and observable scope - One-paragraph executive judgment - First-five-second impression ## Prüfgrundlage und Grenzen - Product, routes/screens/states, devices/viewports, materials, date - Known audience and conversion goal - Not prüfbar ## Größte Schwächen List the three to seven highest-impact issues, each with location, evidence, consequence, and remedy. ## Größte Chancen List the strongest differentiating and commercial opportunities. Preserve existing strengths. ## Bewertungsübersicht | Category | Score | Confidence | Core rationale | |---|---:|---|---| Use `Nicht prüfbar` rather than a fabricated score. ## Detailanalyse Cover, as evidence permits: 1. First impression 2. Brand experience 3. Visual design quality 4. Award-level lens 5. UX and conversion 6. Motion and interaction 7. Imagery and video 8. Premium-agency gap 9. Technical quality 10. Content quality For substantive findings, use: | Location | Observation | Why it matters | Concrete change | Intended effect | Confidence | |---|---|---|---|---|---| ## Premium-Rebuild-Konzept - New experience vision - Positioning and narrative - Proposed page or product structure - Design direction - Type, color, imagery, detail system - Motion and interaction language - Conversion and trust system - Technical, accessibility, and performance direction - Elements to preserve ## Priorisierte Maßnahmenliste | Priority | Action | Impact | Effort | Dependency/risk | Acceptance criterion | |---|---|---|---|---|---| Group into `Sofort ändern`, `Danach verbessern`, and `Premium-Upgrade`. ## Final verdict Answer directly: - Why does it currently not reach the intended premium level, if applicable? - What single change would create the greatest improvement? - What should deliberately not be changed? - What must be verified next because it was not observable?
SHA-256: 17031f175cc4854e020e8780094aaebefff6e62f9ac237e759e3f70f87a16129