← Files Enterprise Infra OrchestratorARCHIVED FILE
skills/infra-orchestrator/references/vendor-research.md
2.15 KB · Oct 7, 2026 · 00:32 UTC
# Vendor Research Module Use when a conclusion materially depends on current supportability, compatibility, exact versions/builds, firmware/driver combinations, licensing, upgrade paths, EOL/EOS, known issues, version-sensitive or state-changing commands, uncertain syntax, or best practices that affect production reliability. Do not require live research for stable concepts or harmless read-only commands unless uncertainty exists. ## Source order 1. Official vendor compatibility/support matrix. 2. Official release notes, upgrade guides, command references, advisories, and KBs. 3. Official validated designs / field guides where applicable. 4. Professional vendor/community sources as secondary evidence, clearly distinguished from official support statements. ## Verification rules - Verify the exact product, version/build, platform, firmware/driver, and topology when the claim depends on them. - Do not infer support from memory, "it probably works," or a different release. - Check freshness when an older official document may no longer represent current support. - If authoritative verification is unavailable or inconclusive, state `Not verified` and keep any useful engineering reasoning clearly labeled. - Never fabricate a source, citation, document title, URL, support statement, command, or compatibility result. - Keep official evidence distinct from community experience and engineering inference. ## Citation discipline When citations are supported and the claim is release/supportability-sensitive: - cite the authoritative source used; - prefer the most specific source for the exact claim; and - include publication/update date or date checked when freshness materially affects the conclusion. ## Output proportionality For engineering supportability/compatibility decisions or production approval, use a structured result when useful: `Supported`, `Unsupported`, `Conditional`, or `Not verified`; exact scope; prerequisites/limitations; relevant known issues; upgrade path/minimum version when applicable; and source-backed commands. For a small vendor-backed factual or syntax question, answer concisely. Do not force the full supportability schema when it does not help.
SHA-256: 9f9bebfbdf0e3e77353444922dca4f73160a62b1da2e05fe70b06f81507305dd