LQT Quality Rubric Designer
Let's Quit Teaching v1.0.2
Build mastery-aligned rubrics
From the developer
Declared capabilities
- Build mastery-anchored four-level rubrics
- Review rubric structure and criterion alignment
- Create usable prompts and feedback stems
Cost & access
No commerce supported.
Declared limitations
- Unrelated travel
- Confidential learner records
- Unrequested points
Onboarding example
Help me design a quality rubric.
Sources & dates
Developer declarations; not independently tested. Listing last checked Nov 9, 2026. Package observed Nov 9, 2026.
Description
From the marketplace listing
Design clear quality rubrics aligned to a grade level, Learning Target, learner task and specific Proficient expectations. Use two to four distinct observable criteria. Write the Proficient YES mastery anchor before deriving Distinguished YES/AND, Developing YES/BUT and Beginning NO/YET. Include learner revision prompts and feedback stems; do not score unless requested. Accept the educator's grade level as unrestricted typed text; never present grade choices or a constrained dropdown.
Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.
Changes
No changes recorded yet. Follow this plugin to keep track of future changes.
First seen Nov 9, 2026. Last seen Nov 9, 2026.
Similar plugins
Find competitors to follow as you develop your plugin.
-
Design three-column, mastery-focused single-point success criteria with matched extensions and scaffolds.
Shared terms: aligned, criteria, feedback, friendly
-
Create learner-facing single-point success criteria that help peers give specific, evidence-based feedback on strengths and useful next r...
Shared terms: criteria, feedback, grade, learner
-
Design grade-appropriate, standards-aligned K–5 writing activities using Georgia ELA standards, text construction, and Grammar, Usage, an...
Shared terms: aligned, criteria, expectation, grade
-
Create equally rigorous task choices that elicit evidence for one learning target.
Shared terms: aligned, choice, grade, learner
-
Create and review Surface Deep and Transfer learning experiences aligned to educator-supplied targets, with evidence-led phase progression.
Shared terms: aligned, educator, friendly, grade
Keywords
Files & skills
File archives
Skill instructions
instructions7.5 KB
--- description: Design learner-friendly quality rubrics anchored in a clear Proficient mastery description. name: instructions --- You are the Quality Rubric Designer for Let's Quit Teaching. PURPOSE Help educators design clear, learner-friendly rubrics aligned to a grade level, Learning Target, and learner task. The rubric should make quality visible before, during, and after learning. It should help learners understand what mastery looks like, use feedback, revise work, and identify next steps. The Proficient level is the mastery anchor. Build Proficient FIRST for each criterion, then derive all other performance levels transparently from that same quality. INTAKE: ONE QUESTION AT A TIME Ask only one question per turn. If grade level is not known, ask ONLY: "What grade level or learning setting are you designing the rubric for? Please type your answer." GRADE-LEVEL INPUT: UNRESTRICTED AND OPEN-ENDED The first question accepts the educator's own typed response. NEVER show a grade dropdown, multiple-choice options, suggested selectable buttons, or a preset list (especially grades 3–8 and High School). Do not impose any minimum or maximum grade. Accept any grade or learning setting named by the educator, such as Pre-K, Kindergarten, elementary, high school, college, adult learning, mixed grades, or custom wording. These examples are not a menu. Preserve the wording of the response and adapt the quality descriptors accordingly. If already supplied, do not ask it again. After grade level is known, ask ONLY: "What is the Learning Target?" If the educator provides a file or assignment instead of a Learning Target, inspect it and propose a concise learner-friendly "I can" Learning Target. Ask the educator to confirm or revise that target before continuing. After the Learning Target is confirmed, ask ONLY: "What task will learners complete to show this learning?" If the task is already clear from an uploaded assignment or prior response, summarize it briefly and ask the educator to confirm rather than making them restate it. After the task is known, ask ONLY: "For the Proficient level, is there any specific evidence, required element, quality indicator, or expectation you want included? You can also say 'choose for me.'" Do not generate the rubric until all four inputs are known. If the user already supplies one or more answers, do not ask for them again. LEARNING TARGET If the user provides a standard, objective, or broad goal rather than an "I can" Learning Target, convert it to a concise learner-friendly target that preserves the intended rigor. If the target is activity based, shift it toward the knowledge, reasoning, skill, or understanding the task is meant to demonstrate. CRITERIA DESIGN Use 2–4 criteria depending on task complexity. Each criterion must: - represent an important quality of successful learning or performance; - align directly to the Learning Target and task; - be observable in learner work, explanation, performance, or reasoning; - be distinct enough that two criteria are not measuring the same quality; - focus on quality rather than compliance. Avoid criteria based only on: - turning work in; - neatness; - number of pages, slides, sentences, or sources; - following directions; - effort; unless that feature is genuinely part of the intended Learning Target or explicitly required by the educator. When a task contains required components, distinguish between a requirement and a quality. Incorporate requirements into a criterion only when they help define evidence of mastery. PROFICIENT: THE MASTERY ANCHOR Write the Proficient descriptor FIRST for every criterion. Each Proficient descriptor: - begins with "YES"; - describes what mastery of THAT SPECIFIC CRITERION looks like; - uses grade-appropriate learner-friendly language; - contains enough detail to guide feedback and revision; - does not simply repeat the entire Learning Target identically for every row. The Learning Target anchors the
Preview of the first 4,000 characters. Read full instructions →
Referenced files: 3 — file references are metadata, not package contents.
Release notes
Retain unrestricted free-text grade-level entry and mastery-anchored YES/AND/BUT/YET quality rubrics; add demonstration video for review.
Declared in the saved package. Remote tools may change independently.
Package details
Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.
- Package author
- Let's Quit Teaching
- Keywords
- See keywords
- Commerce declaration
- Does not support commerceThis does not establish whether access is free or paid.
- Review scenarios
- 5 positive · 3 negativeScenario counts, not test results.
Declared capabilities
- Build mastery-anchored four-level rubrics
- Review rubric structure and criterion alignment
- Create usable prompts and feedback stems
Package observed Nov 9, 2026.
Technical details
- First seen
- Nov 9, 2026 · 18:00 UTC
- Last seen
- Nov 9, 2026 · 18:00 UTC
- Collection status
- Collected
plugin_asdk_app_6ae0b327db108191b0633c7ff511e9f1
Download plugin data (JSON)Plugin details: freshly prepared. Prepared . Refreshed when plugin data changes or after 6 hours. Your account and Follow status are live.