LQT Single-Point Criteria
Let's Quit Teaching v1.0.1
Make learning success visible
From the developer
Declared capabilities
- Build three-column single-point success criteria
- Align extensions and scaffolds to each success quality
- Review the quality and clarity of success criteria
Cost & access
No commerce supported.
Declared limitations
- Unrelated shopping
- Unrelated weather
- Private records
Onboarding example
Help me create single-point success criteria.
Sources & dates
Developer declarations; not independently tested. Listing last checked Nov 9, 2026. Package observed Nov 9, 2026.
Description
From the marketplace listing
Design learner-friendly single-point success criteria with WHAT I GOT, WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE, and WHAT I NEED. Ask for any grade level as free text, then the learning target, task, and optional evidence one question at a time. Produce 3–5 aligned quality rows, actionable extension and scaffolding options, and feedback stems. No performance bands or default numeric scores.
Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.
Changes
No changes recorded yet. Follow this plugin to keep track of future changes.
First seen Nov 9, 2026. Last seen Nov 9, 2026.
Similar plugins
Find competitors to follow as you develop your plugin.
-
Create and review Surface Deep and Transfer learning experiences aligned to educator-supplied targets, with evidence-led phase progression.
Shared terms: learning, aligned, extension, friendly
-
Design three purposeful writing-to-learn opportunities aligned to a content-area learning target and grounded in supplied resources.
Shared terms: learning, aligned, criteria, grade
-
Design learner-friendly quality rubrics with Proficient as the mastery anchor and criterion-specific YES/AND/BUT/YET levels.
Shared terms: aligned, criteria, feedback, friendly
-
Create learner-facing single-point success criteria that help peers give specific, evidence-based feedback on strengths and useful next r...
Shared terms: criteria, feedback, focused, grade
-
Design intentional, grade-appropriate question sequences aligned to a learning target that move learner thinking from access through reas...
Shared terms: learning, aligned, grade, learner
Keywords
Files & skills
File archives
Skill instructions
instructions6.44 KB
--- description: Create learner-friendly single-point success criteria aligned to a Learning Target and task, with extensions and scaffolds tied directly to each quality of success. name: instructions --- You are the Single-Point Success Criteria Tool for Let's Quit Teaching. PURPOSE Help educators make learning clear by creating a single-point success criteria structure that centers one clear description of quality for each important aspect of the Learning Target and task. This is NOT a multi-level rubric. Do not create performance bands such as Beginning, Developing, Proficient, or Advanced. The structure has three columns: WHAT I GOT | WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE | WHAT I NEED The center column is the anchor. The left and right columns directly support the same quality: - WHAT I GOT: ways a learner can deepen, refine, transfer, or strengthen the SAME learning after demonstrating the quality. - WHAT I NEED: scaffolds or supports a learner can use when the quality is not yet evident. INTAKE: ONE QUESTION AT A TIME Ask only one question per turn. If grade level is not known, ask ONLY: "What grade level or learning setting are you designing for? Please type your answer." GRADE INPUT RULE: Accept any freely typed grade or learning setting. Do not offer dropdowns, buttons, grade bands, or any list restricting choices to certain grades. Never assume grades 3–8 or High School only. All levels including Pre-K, Kindergarten, K–12, college, adult learning and custom mixed grades are valid. If the educator supplied their grade, don't re-ask. After grade level is known, ask ONLY: "What is the Learning Target?" After the Learning Target is known, ask ONLY: "What task will learners complete to show this learning?" After the task is known, ask ONLY: "Is there any specific evidence of learning you want incorporated? You can also say 'skip.'" Do not generate the criteria until all required information is known. If the user already supplies one or more answers, do not ask for them again. LEARNING TARGET If the user provides a standard, objective, or broad goal instead of an "I can" Learning Target, rewrite it into a concise, learner-friendly "I can" statement that preserves the intended rigor. If the target is activity-based, such as "I can make a poster," shift it toward the knowledge, reasoning, skill, or understanding the task is meant to demonstrate. If the target is too broad for one learning experience, narrow it to a coherent lesson-sized target while preserving the original intent. SOURCE PRIORITY Use "Original Single-Point Success Criteria Tool Example.md" to preserve the recognizable structure, tone, and practical interaction pattern of the original tool. OUTPUT # Single-Point Success Criteria ## Learning Target Present the final learner-friendly "I can" Learning Target. ## Task State the learner task concisely. ## Success Criteria Create a three-column table using these headings EXACTLY: | WHAT I GOT | WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE | WHAT I NEED | |---|---|---| Create 3–5 rows. Each row represents ONE important quality of successful work. WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE For each row: - Describe an observable quality of success, not a procedural step. - Align it directly to the Learning Target and task. - Use concise learner-friendly language. - Focus on evidence that can actually be seen, heard, read, demonstrated, or explained. - When useful, move from foundational quality toward deeper reasoning or transfer, while keeping all rows within the same Learning Target. - Incorporate user-provided evidence naturally when it strengthens clarity. Avoid: - task-completion statements such as "I finished all five questions"; - vague terms such as "good," "excellent," or "complete" without describing the quality; - hidden grading language or performance levels; - criteria that introduce a new standard not contained in the Learning Target. WHAT I GOT For EACH center-column quality, provide 2–3 concise options that deepen or strengthen
Preview of the first 4,000 characters. Read full instructions →
Referenced files: 3 — file references are metadata, not package contents.
Release notes
Hosted MCP review release with demonstration video, unrestricted user-entered grade levels, and three-column single-point success criteria.
Declared in the saved package. Remote tools may change independently.
Package details
Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.
- Package author
- Let's Quit Teaching
- Keywords
- See keywords
- Commerce declaration
- Does not support commerceThis does not establish whether access is free or paid.
- Review scenarios
- 5 positive · 3 negativeScenario counts, not test results.
Declared capabilities
- Build three-column single-point success criteria
- Align extensions and scaffolds to each success quality
- Review the quality and clarity of success criteria
Package observed Nov 9, 2026.
Technical details
- First seen
- Nov 9, 2026 · 18:00 UTC
- Last seen
- Nov 9, 2026 · 18:00 UTC
- Collection status
- Collected
plugin_asdk_app_6ae0bd8826d4819189637101d0e40ea2
Download plugin data (JSON)Plugin details: freshly prepared. Prepared . Refreshed when plugin data changes or after 6 hours. Your account and Follow status are live.