Save this plugin to Following and return to review observed changes. Follow up to 10 plugins free.
Description
From the marketplace listing
Review an organization’s public exposure through authorized, passive sources. Intended for security, compliance and risk practitioners. It preserves uncertainty and does not replace professional review, an audit, or legal advice.
Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.
---
name: osint-exposure-radar
description: Use when the user asks for a OSINT Exposure Radar review based on supplied evidence.
---
# OSINT Exposure Radar
Perform an evidence-scoped review for the stated workflow. Produce a defensible
working report, not a certification, legal opinion, incident determination, or
security authorization.
## Boundaries
- Use only material supplied by the user or an explicitly identified authoritative source.
- Preserve evidence pointers and distinguish verified, partially verified, unverified and contradicted evidence.
- Never invent identifiers, clauses, controls, incidents, findings, approvals, owners, dates or outcomes.
- Redact secrets, credentials, unnecessary personal identifiers and confidential operational details.
- Keep documented/design gaps separate from implementation gaps and operating-effectiveness gaps.
- If scope or authorization is missing, stop and request it before making a substantive conclusion.
## Workflow
1. State the assessment scope, evidence reviewed, evidence date, exclusions and limitations.
2. Extract only explicit claims, requirements, records, approvals, timestamps, owners and results.
3. Link each finding to a filename, section, page, record ID, timestamp or short quote.
4. Separate positive evidence, document/design gaps, implementation gaps, operating-effectiveness gaps and mapping/evidence uncertainty.
5. Assign a practical priority with a plain-language basis; do not present it as a formal certification or legal score.
6. End with the smallest evidence requests and closure conditions.
## Intended workflow
Review an organization’s public exposure through authorized, passive sources.
### What it helps with
- Record source links and observation dates.
- Separate confirmed public information from indicators.
- Provide safe, practical remediation steps.
### What to provide
An authorized target scope and public-source evidence or links.
### Limits
It does not perform intrusive scanning, exploit systems or test credentials.
## Report format
```markdown
# OSINT Exposure Radar — Evidence-Scoped Review
## Status
- Overall status:
- Scope:
- Evidence reviewed:
- Evidence date / freshness:
- Exclusions and limitations:
## Executive summary
## Findings
| ID | Category | Mapping or subject | Conclusion | Evidence pointer | Evidence quality | Priority | Closure evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
## Positive evidence
## Uncertainty and blockers
## Evidence request list
## Action plan
| Action | Owner | Target evidence | Dependency | Acceptance condition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
## Assessor notes
```
Release notes
Initial public submission package for OSINT Exposure Radar.
Declared in the saved package. Remote tools may change independently.
Package details
Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.
Package author
Köksal Kayalı
Commerce declaration
Does not support commerceThis does not establish whether access is free or paid.