· 1 observation
Technical updates · 1
Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →TLY SOFT PRIVATE LIMITED v1.0.0
Search Indian law with sources
From the developer
Not specified in the available declarations: capabilities, limitations, pricing & account requirements.
Find Supreme Court judgments on personal liberty under Article 21 and give source identifiers.
Developer declarations; not independently tested. Listing last checked Nov 9, 2026. Package observed Nov 9, 2026.
From the marketplace listing
Vitark connects ChatGPT to Indian case law and legislation for research grounded in source records. Search Supreme Court and High Court judgments and available tribunal and regulator decisions; find a case by name, case number, neutral citation or CNR; retrieve available judgment text; and look up statutory provisions. Explore similar cases, entity-linked cases and available citation links. Results include available source identifiers and retrieval limits. Judgment text may arrive in slices, and citation links may be unresolved candidates rather than verified later treatment. Verify the underlying text before relying on a result. Connect your existing Vitark account through secure sign-in. Successful substantive research calls use its credit balance; checking the balance is free. Vitark provides legal research information and does not replace advice from a qualified advocate.
Language: English · Automatically detected from descriptions.
Exact text from the indicated source. A mention alone does not establish support for your task.
Vitark connects ChatGPT to Indian case law and legislation for research grounded in source records. Search Supreme Court and High Court judgments and available tribunal and regulator decisions; find a case by name, case number, neutral citation or CNR; retrieve available judgment text; and look up statutory provisions. Explore similar cases, entity-linked cases and available citation links. Results include available source identifiers and retrieval limits. Judgment text may arrive in slices, and citation links may be unresolved candidates rather than verified later treatment. Verify the underlying text before relying on a result. Connect your existing Vitark account through secure sign-in. Successful substantive research calls use its credit balance; checking the balance is free. Vitark provides legal research information and does not replace advice from a qualified advocate.
· 1 observation
Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →· 2 observations
Package or technical metadata updated
View technical comparison →Find competitors to follow as you develop your plugin.
Search indexed Indian judgments and legislation and retrieve source excerpts.
Shared terms: indian, source, search, advice
Legal research and matter work in ChatGPT: search Indian case law, statutes and judgments with source links, and work with your Gotham ma...
Shared terms: indian, law, case, citation
Source-based research in Polish statutes, judgments, tax rulings and regulator documents (ZUS, KNF, UODO, UOKiK unfair-terms register) th...
Shared terms: law, source, case, citation
Read-only research in Polish and EU law: statutes, case law and a citation graph, with a source and a locator for every result.
Shared terms: law, source, case, citation
Legal research in German law for your chat: court decisions, statutes and citation checks for lawyers, law firms and law students. Every ...
Shared terms: law, source, case, citation
--- name: legal-research description: Research Indian judgments, tribunal decisions, statutory text, and later judicial treatment with Vitark MCP; use for authority finding, named-case lookup, source verification, and citation-grounded legal research. --- # Vitark Legal Research Use Vitark MCP for Indian legal research. Treat retrieved material as research evidence, not legal advice, and state material source and coverage limits. ## Choose the tool - Use `vitark_search` for issue-based research. Pass the user's legal question verbatim; the tool performs query planning, retrieval, deduplication, reranking, and enrichment internally. Use `scope="cases"`, `scope="statutes"`, or `scope="all"`. Put a bench or case type in the query text because those are not filters. Add `courts`, date or year bounds, statute-year bounds, `ministry`, or `limit` only when the request supplies or clearly requires them. - Use `vitark_statute_search` for focused statutory research and exact Act-and-section retrieval. When a prior result supplies `act_id`, pass it back with `section_number`; do not guess `act_slug`. Quote `section_text`, never the clipped `snippet`, and treat the section as complete only when `section_text_complete` is true. - Use `vitark_case_find` for a party or case name, docket number, neutral citation, or CNR. Pass either `name` or `case_number`. A partial name match is only a candidate until the metadata or text confirms the same matter. - Use `vitark_case_text` when the judgment's reasoning or exact words matter. It accepts a CNR and can also resolve an unambiguous neutral citation or docket number. Continue long judgments with the returned `next_offset` while `truncated` is true. - Use `vitark_similar_cases` after identifying a strong seed CNR. Set `group_by_case=true` when the user needs distinct judgments rather than passage-level results. - Use `vitark_entity_suggest` to resolve a judge, party, advocate, Act, or place to the canonical value used by the entity index. - Use `vitark_cases_by` for metadata lists by judge, party, advocate, Act and section, court, year, category, disposition, case type, or case number. Prefer a norm returned by `vitark_entity_suggest`. Always pair `section` or `act_year` with `act` or `act_norm`. This index covers only the entity-extracted subset and is topic-blind. - Use `vitark_case_citations` for Acts and cases cited by a known judgment and for approximate later citing candidates. It requires a CNR returned by Vitark. - Use `get_credit_balance` when the user asks about credits, a call is declined, or a planned workflow would make many paid calls. It is free. The callable surface has exactly these nine tools. Do not call a name absent from the connected server's tool catalog. ## Read result envelopes Tool results arrive as JSON text. Parse the JSON object before assessing it; do not expect structured-content fields or an output schema. For search envelopes, distinguish `results` (cases) from `statute_results` (statutes). Check `status`, `source_outcomes`, `resolved_scope`, `notes`, `empty_corpora`, and `unresolved_courts`. `resolved_scope.legs.partial_detail` identifies incomplete sources and gives human-readable reasons. A partial or failed source, an unresolved court, a searched corpus with no matches, and an ordinary zero-result query are different outcomes; report the one the response actually states. Read `support_basis` before interpreting `support_level`. In case search it grades rerank relevance, not legal entailment. In focused statute search it grades Act-and-section identity, not whether the provision answers the user's question. Review `statutory_provisions` before semantic statute rows, then follow `resolved_scope.statute_reading_order`; duplicate statute mirrors may have been collapsed. If statute rows were not reranked, do not compare producer vector ranks across collections. If the user gives a section number without identifying the Act or regulation, ask which enactment
Preview of the first 4,000 characters. Read full instructions →
Referenced files: 1 — file references are metadata, not package contents.
Publisher declarations from the archived package. These are separate from our research and the live service's terms.
Package observed Nov 9, 2026.
plugin_asdk_app_6aa6b41727648191a996159da3af5e9e
Download plugin data (JSON)Plugin details: served from cache. Prepared . Refreshed when plugin data changes or after 6 hours. Your account and Follow status are live.