Update to Inner Lens

{
  "description": "Compare validated Inner Lens system reports, bound to one release bundle, when a user requests a bounded, traceable cross-method evidence view.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "references/synthesis-contract.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 3491
    }
  ],
  "name": "synthesize-metaphysics",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: synthesize-metaphysics\ndescription: Compare validated Inner Lens system reports, bound to one release bundle, when a user requests a bounded, traceable cross-method evidence view.\n---\n\n# Synthesize validated Inner Lens reports\n\nRequire separate canonical calculation and validation for each selected system before synthesis: use this Skill only with two or three per-system `validatedReport` payloads returned by `validate_interpretation_report` in the same current conversation. Each source must be `valid: true`, have `nextAction: render-validated`, represent a distinct system among Liuyao, Bazi, and Ziwei, and be validated under the exact same current release bundle. If fewer than two qualifying sources remain, stop with an explicit limitation.\n\n1. Read [the complete synthesis contract](references/synthesis-contract.md).\n2. Never treat a facts-only `fallback`, a `repair-once` result, or an unvalidated draft as a validated source. Never cite raw model prose, an invalid report, or a report validated under a different release bundle. Never use remembered traditional meaning or a source from another conversation.\n3. Call the registered `get_cross_method_evidence` tool with the exact validated reports and the release bundle each was validated under. Present only its returned bounded `overlap`, `divergence`, and `limitation` sections, already linked to source claim IDs, evidence, and limitations. Preserve the source system, school, reading contract, target period, claim IDs, evidence references, counter-evidence, and limitations without reinterpretation.\n4. Do not call `prepare_interpretation` or `validate_interpretation_report` for synthesis, and do not call calculation, chart, or export tools. The report-v2 contract is system-owned; this Skill does not produce its own validated cross-method report v2.\n5. No compatibility verdict, score, prediction, recommendation, or remembered traditional meaning. Do not vote, rank, merge conflicting claims, invent a bridge, or claim overlap across systems as independent confirmation.\n\nPlan 5 owns validated-only cross-method synthesis: a bounded, release-bundle-bound evidence view over already validated system reports, never a new divination conclusion.\n"
}