Update to Rohas Legal AI: Litigation

{
  "description": "Draft first-person witness statements, affidavits, declarations, or proofs of evidence from a witness's own account. Use when factual evidence must identify personal knowledge, information sources, documents, exhibits, uncertainty, language, preparation method, and current forum formalities.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 318
    }
  ],
  "name": "witness-statement-drafter",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: witness-statement-drafter\ndescription: >-\n  Draft first-person witness statements, affidavits, declarations, or proofs of\n  evidence from a witness's own account. Use when factual evidence must identify\n  personal knowledge, information sources, documents, exhibits, uncertainty,\n  language, preparation method, and current forum formalities.\n---\n\n# Witness Statement Drafter\n\nPreserve the witness's evidence, vocabulary, uncertainty, and independence. A\nstatement is not written submissions in the witness's voice.\n\n## Intake and interview\n\nObtain the forum rules and order, issues, pleadings, prior accounts, interview\nnotes or recording, relevant documents, chronology, witness role and capacity,\nlanguage and literacy, memory aids, source of information, exhibits, disclosure\nstatus, privilege boundaries, vulnerabilities, deadline, and statement of truth\nor oath requirements.\n\n## Drafting method\n\n1. Explain purpose, disclosure and cross-examination consequences, truth duty,\n   privilege limits, document preservation, and the witness's right to correct the draft.\n2. Establish identity, role, relationship to the parties, relevant experience,\n   and how the statement was prepared.\n3. Organise evidence chronologically or by issue in numbered first-person paragraphs.\n4. State only facts the witness could properly give orally. Identify personal\n   observation, refreshed recollection, usual practice, inference, and information\n   or belief with its source.\n5. Use the witness's own words and level of certainty. Preserve “I do not know,”\n   “I do not recall,” estimates, reconstructed dates, and qualified recollection.\n6. Link documents and exhibits with accurate identifiers. Do not imply the\n   witness created, sent, received, read, or understood a document without a basis.\n7. Reconcile material differences from prior statements, pleadings, documents,\n   and other accounts; record the witness's explanation rather than conceal it.\n8. Exclude legal argument, commentary on others' motives, inadmissible hearsay,\n   expert opinion, privileged content, and unnecessary personal data unless proper.\n9. Record interpreter, translation, accessibility, interview, drafting,\n   document-review, and remote-signing circumstances where required.\n10. Have the witness review the full statement and exhibits, make genuine\n    corrections, and sign or swear only the approved final version.\n\n## Output\n\nProvide the draft statement, exhibit list, knowledge-and-source schedule,\nuncertainty and inconsistency note, formalities checklist, and unresolved questions.\n\n## Guardrails\n\nNever invent recollection, improve certainty, harmonise accounts artificially,\ncoach a false answer, suppress adverse facts, or sign for the witness. Do not use\ncollective corporate knowledge as personal knowledge. Verify current format,\nstatement-of-truth, oath, filing, service, and language requirements.\n"
}