← Rohas Legal AI: FamilyCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Rohas Legal AI: Family
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:14 UTC · version 0.2.3
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"description": "Assesses and drafts Indian matrimonial petitions with the correct governing law, court, grounds, particulars and connected reliefs. Use for divorce, mutual consent, judicial separation, nullity, restitution or related interim applications.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 284
}
],
"name": "matrimonial-petition-drafter",
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: matrimonial-petition-drafter\ndescription: Assesses and drafts Indian matrimonial petitions with the correct governing law, court, grounds, particulars and connected reliefs. Use for divorce, mutual consent, judicial separation, nullity, restitution or related interim applications.\n---\n\n# Matrimonial Petition Drafter\n\nDraft from verified material facts under the marriage regime that actually governs. Do not infer personal law from a name, ceremony or assumption.\n\n## Required inputs\n\n- Parties' identities, religions or legal status where relevant, domicile and citizenship\n- Marriage date, place, form, registration and certificate or proof\n- Last shared residence, current addresses and court territory facts\n- Children, parenting arrangements and safeguarding concerns\n- Proposed ground and dated supporting facts and evidence\n- Separation, reconciliation, mediation and mutual-consent history\n- Income, maintenance, residence, property and litigation information\n- Prior petitions, orders, criminal or protection-order matters and desired relief\n\n## Method\n\n1. **Select the governing law.** Test the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Special Marriage Act, 1954, Divorce Act, 1869, Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, personal law, foreign-marriage rules or another applicable regime. Verify current amendments and controlling authority.\n2. **Identify the route.** Distinguish contested divorce, mutual consent, judicial separation, void or voidable marriage, restitution and other relief. Confirm eligibility, statutory bars, waiting periods and exceptions.\n3. **Establish forum.** Plead the correct Family Court or other court, territorial connecting facts, party standing and any transfer or parallel-proceeding issue.\n4. **Map ground to facts.** List every legal ingredient, material fact, date and source. Plead particulars without evidence-heavy argument, scandalous detail or unsupported conclusions.\n5. **Build the chronology.** Reconcile marriage, cohabitation, incidents, separation, notices, proceedings and attempted resolution. Explain material gaps or inconsistent dates.\n6. **Address connected relief.** Consider interim and final maintenance, litigation expenses, children, residence or protection, property, return of articles, costs and interim restraint under the correct statute and forum.\n7. **Handle settlement safely.** Confirm informed, voluntary consent and exact agreed terms. Do not use mediation where coercive control or an active protective order makes it unsafe.\n8. **Complete procedure.** Draft parties, jurisdiction, facts, cause of action, grounds, prayers, verification, affidavit, annexure index, filing checklist and privacy or in-camera requests.\n\n## Output\n\nProduce an applicability and maintainability note, petition, synopsis and list of dates, interim applications where requested, evidence and annexure schedule, authority-verification table and filing-risk checklist.\n\n## Guardrails\n\n- Do not fabricate grounds, jurisdiction, service, consent, separation dates, affidavits or evidence.\n- Do not threaten criminal, custody or immigration action to force a matrimonial settlement.\n- Protect child identities, addresses, confidential records and intimate material; seek restricted filing where appropriate.\n- Do not guarantee a decree or assume that one statute resolves every maintenance, custody or property issue.\n- Require qualified Indian family counsel to verify law, court rules, limitation, format and filing.\n"
}SHA-256 of public snapshot: 6f0ebc2f2a4ccd5cfaaffebad3acdefcab61ce65fdf7fdbf39559a178db82606