Update to Rohas Legal AI: IP

{
  "name": "cease-desist-drafter",
  "description": "Draft proportionate, source-backed intellectual-property cease and desist notices. Use when a rights holder needs to identify its patent, trademark, copyright, design, trade-secret, domain, or passing-off claim; preserve evidence; demand defined action; and propose a response or resolution path.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 306
    }
  ],
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: cease-desist-drafter\ndescription: >-\n  Draft proportionate, source-backed intellectual-property cease and desist\n  notices. Use when a rights holder needs to identify its patent, trademark,\n  copyright, design, trade-secret, domain, or passing-off claim; preserve\n  evidence; demand defined action; and propose a response or resolution path.\n---\n\n# Cease and Desist Drafter\n\nDraft a credible enforcement communication, not a substitute for an infringement\nopinion. Verify current law and right status before asserting legal conclusions.\n\n## Intake\n\nObtain the jurisdiction, sender and recipient, asserted rights, registrations or\napplications, title documents, relevant goods or services, alleged acts, dates,\nterritories, specimens, source URLs, prior communications, urgency, commercial\nobjective, desired demands, and litigation or regulatory context.\n\n## Drafting method\n\n1. Identify the sender's legal and beneficial interest and authority to enforce.\n2. Verify the right's owner, status, scope, territory, priority, term, renewals,\n   limitations, disclaimers, licences, security interests, and pending challenges.\n3. Preserve and cite evidence of the recipient's conduct, date, source, audience,\n   product, channel, and territory. Distinguish observation from inference.\n4. State the protected subject matter precisely. Do not rely on a registration\n   number without explaining the relevant claims, mark, work, design, secret, or\n   goodwill.\n5. Explain the infringement theory element by element and acknowledge material\n   uncertainty, permitted use, exhaustion, licence, exception, defence, or\n   validity issues requiring investigation.\n6. Describe harm proportionately without unsupported sales, confusion, copying,\n   wilfulness, criminality, or damages claims.\n7. Tailor demands: cease identified acts, preserve evidence, remove or quarantine\n   specified material, disclose channels or quantities where lawful, confirm\n   compliance, account, negotiate, or provide an explanation.\n8. Set a reasonable dated deadline and delivery method. Separate urgent\n   preservation or interim-relief needs from ordinary response timing.\n9. Offer a practical route for clarification, licence, coexistence, undertaking,\n   settlement, or counsel-to-counsel engagement where appropriate.\n10. Reserve rights without claiming remedies unavailable in the jurisdiction.\n\n## Output\n\nProvide the notice, a claim-and-evidence schedule, an annex list, open factual or\nlegal questions, service options, and recommended escalation steps.\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not threaten baseless proceedings, misstate registration or ownership, conceal\nadverse facts, demand destruction contrary to preservation duties, or imply that\nsilence is admission. Avoid overbroad restraints on lawful speech, competition,\ninteroperability, repair, criticism, parody, or other protected activity. Obtain\nlocal counsel review before sending high-stakes or cross-border notices.\n"
}