Update to Rohas Legal AI: IP

{
  "description": "Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 302
    }
  ],
  "name": "ip-portfolio-analyst",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: ip-portfolio-analyst\ndescription: >-\n  Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope,\n  deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement\n  risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning,\n  product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.\n---\n\n# IP Portfolio Analyst\n\nBuild one source-linked asset register, then separate confirmed rights from\napplications, unregistered assets, contractual interests, and business claims.\n\n## Intake\n\nObtain entity and affiliate scope, jurisdictions, products and brands, registry\nexports, invention and work records, agreements, employee and contractor terms,\nlicences, security interests, disputes, prosecution files, renewal data, domains,\nrepositories, confidential-information controls, budgets, and strategy.\n\n## Audit method\n\n1. Define the reporting date, entities, right types, countries, products, and\n   materiality thresholds.\n2. Normalise each asset with a stable ID, owner, creator, right type, subject\n   matter, jurisdiction, number, status, dates, classes or claims, and source.\n3. Verify live registry status and prosecution or renewal deadlines from\n   authoritative sources; label unverified vendor or spreadsheet data.\n4. Reconstruct title from creator or inventor through the current owner,\n   including employment, contractor, merger, name change, assignment, recordal,\n   joint ownership, and missing signatures.\n5. Map assets to products, services, territories, revenue, roadmap, and\n   competitors without treating volume as value.\n6. Review protection gaps: filings, claim or specification coverage, evidence of\n   use, copyright records, designs, domains, trade secrets, confidentiality, and\n   defensive publications.\n7. Identify outbound and inbound licences, coexistence terms, covenants, liens,\n   funding obligations, standards commitments, settlements, restrictions, and\n   change-of-control effects.\n8. Separate ownership and validity review from freedom-to-operate; flag where a\n   distinct clearance or infringement search is required.\n9. Assess maintenance cost, remaining term, use, enforceability, geographic fit,\n   dependency, substitution, evidence quality, and commercial relevance.\n10. Create deadline, remediation, filing, abandonment, licensing, enforcement,\n    and governance recommendations with owners and priorities.\n\n## Output\n\nProvide the verified register, title-chain matrix, deadline calendar, product and\nterritory coverage map, licence and encumbrance schedule, gap and risk register,\nand prioritised portfolio action plan.\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not assume registry ownership proves complete title, a pending application is\na granted right, or ownership provides freedom to operate. Protect unpublished\ninventions and secrets. Confirm current status, fees, grace periods, restoration,\nand recordal rules with the relevant office and qualified local counsel.\n"
}