Update to Rohas Legal AI: Public

{
  "description": "Assess and draft public interest litigation in India under Article 32 or Article 226, establishing genuine public injury, standing, maintainability, respondents, evidence, disclosures, and workable relief. Use for proposed PILs, pre-filing merits checks, writ petitions, and PIL defect or filing checklists.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 259
    }
  ],
  "name": "pil-drafter",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: pil-drafter\ndescription: >-\n  Assess and draft public interest litigation in India under Article 32 or\n  Article 226, establishing genuine public injury, standing, maintainability,\n  respondents, evidence, disclosures, and workable relief. Use for proposed PILs,\n  pre-filing merits checks, writ petitions, and PIL defect or filing checklists.\n---\n\n# India PIL Drafter\n\nRun a maintainability screen before drafting. Apply the current Constitution,\nSupreme Court or relevant High Court rules, PIL guidelines, roster and filing\nrequirements on the filing date.\n\n## Intake\n\nObtain the proposed petitioner and credentials, affected class, public injury,\ngeography, impugned action or inaction, public authorities, rights and duties,\nsupporting records, prior representations and responses, related proceedings,\npersonal interests or litigation, urgency, requested relief, and filing forum.\n\n## Assessment and drafting method\n\n1. Identify the precise public harm, affected class, public element, legal duty,\n   constitutional or statutory breach, and evidentiary basis. Separate fact,\n   allegation, inference, expert opinion, and unavailable proof.\n2. Choose the forum deliberately: test Article 32 fundamental-right jurisdiction\n   against the broader Article 226 jurisdiction and territorial cause of action.\n   Check alternative remedies, delay, standing, and forum-specific PIL rules.\n3. Verify that the matter is genuine public interest rather than a private,\n   political, publicity, commercial, service, property, or collateral dispute.\n   Check the court's current accepted and excluded PIL subject categories.\n4. Establish the petitioner's bona fides and nexus to the issue. Collect every\n   disclosure required by the chosen court, including identity, occupation,\n   income, personal interest, funding, related litigation, prior efforts, and the\n   absence of personal gain, private motive, or oblique reason.\n5. Identify necessary and proper respondents, their legal duties, territorial\n   connection, prior notice, response, and any affected parties entitled to be heard.\n6. Develop grounds tied to pleaded facts and current primary authority. Verify\n   every quotation, holding, neutral citation, provision, amendment, and rule.\n7. Frame enforceable relief that respects institutional competence. Explain the\n   legal source, responsible authority, measurable action, timing, and monitoring;\n   justify interim relief through urgency, prima facie case, balance, and harm.\n8. Draft the synopsis, list of dates, parties, jurisdiction, maintainability and\n   bona-fides sections, facts, grounds, representations, prayers, interim prayers,\n   declarations, verification, affidavit, applications, and annexure index in the\n   forum's prescribed form.\n9. Run a filing audit against current court rules, PIL guidelines, default lists,\n   court fees, service, paper-book, redaction, translation, and e-filing requirements.\n\n## Output\n\nProvide the maintainability opinion first. If viable, provide a court-ready draft,\nauthority table, allegation-to-evidence map, respondent and relief matrix, annexure\nplan, disclosure schedule, and filing-defect checklist. If not viable, explain the\nproper representation, statutory remedy, ordinary writ, appeal, or other route.\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not manufacture standing, public injury, urgency, beneficiaries, or evidence;\nuse PIL to bypass an individual remedy; expose protected identities unnecessarily;\nor present an unverified allegation as fact. Require Indian counsel to settle and\nfile the petition under the chosen court's current rules.\n"
}