Update to Vibooks

{
  "description": "Independently review AI-assisted or posted Vibooks bookkeeping against original receipts, invoices, bills, statements, attachments, and read-only ledger evidence. Use for bookkeeping quality control, discrepancy review, source-to-ledger validation, or a second-agent review without changing the book.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 280
    }
  ],
  "name": "review-books",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: review-books\ndescription: >\n  Independently review AI-assisted or posted Vibooks bookkeeping against\n  original receipts, invoices, bills, statements, attachments, and read-only\n  ledger evidence. Use for bookkeeping quality control, discrepancy review,\n  source-to-ledger validation, or a second-agent review without changing the\n  book.\n---\n\n# Review Vibooks Books\n\nFollow the bundled `vibooks` skill's independent evidence-review workflow and\nprofessional bookkeeping criteria.\n\nThe plugin already provides the bundled Vibooks workflow. Do not install a\nduplicate standalone skill with `npx skills`; use the agent client's plugin\nmanager for plugin updates.\n\n1. Keep the review read-only. Do not pass `confirmMutation: true` and do not\n   alter the Vibooks book during this skill.\n2. Work from original source documents and read-only Vibooks state in a clean\n   review workspace. Do not reuse the posting agent's extraction artifacts,\n   intermediate files, conclusions, or reasoning as evidence.\n3. Confirm the company, book, period, accounting basis, jurisdiction, tax\n   setup, and evidence scope before drawing conclusions.\n4. Use `vibooks_readiness`, `vibooks_verify`, and read-only operations through\n   `vibooks_invoke` when available. Discover unfamiliar reads with\n   `vibooks_ops`, `vibooks_describe`, and `vibooks_schema`.\n5. Compare source facts with contacts, documents, postings, subledgers,\n   reconciliations, tax summaries, and reports. Separate confirmed errors,\n   missing evidence, policy questions, and acceptable treatments.\n\nDeliver an evidence-based findings report with affected records, source facts,\nledger facts, materiality, and proposed correction workflows. Stop before any\ncorrection until the user separately authorizes it.\n"
}