Update to WSH Risk Assessment

{
  "description": "Create a new workplace safety and health risk assessment aligned with Singapore's WSH Risk Management Code of Practice. Use for task decomposition, hazard and consequence identification, existing-control evaluation, 5x5 risk evaluation, additional-control selection, and projected residual risk. Do not use merely to audit an existing RA or track control implementation.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "references/Appendix A Specific Hazard Examples.txt",
      "size_in_bytes": 14029
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/Appendix B Control Measures Library.txt",
      "size_in_bytes": 17132
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/Appendix C Activity-to-Hazard Mapping Library.txt",
      "size_in_bytes": 11122
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/Appendix D Consequence Library.txt",
      "size_in_bytes": 10091
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/Output Format.txt",
      "size_in_bytes": 1735
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/control-selection.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 8897
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/core-methodology.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 10015
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/human-organisational-factors.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 3806
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/risk-scoring.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 10484
    },
    {
      "relative_path": "references/specialised-hazards.md",
      "size_in_bytes": 18217
    }
  ],
  "name": "wsh-risk-assessment",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: wsh-risk-assessment\ndescription: Create a new workplace safety and health risk assessment aligned with Singapore's WSH Risk Management Code of Practice. Use for task decomposition, hazard and consequence identification, existing-control evaluation, 5x5 risk evaluation, additional-control selection, and projected residual risk. Do not use merely to audit an existing RA or track control implementation.\n---\n\n# Create a WSH Risk Assessment\n\nBuild a site-specific draft with the people who know the work. Library entries are prompts, not evidence. Label missing information and assumptions, and never claim compliance, approval, completeness, or competent-person endorsement.\n\n## Input gate\n\nBefore creating task-specific rows or scores, obtain: workplace and location; scope and task steps; exposed groups; equipment, tools, materials and substances; and controls actually in place. Do not replace these inputs with generic examples. Ask once for any missing essentials.\n\n## References\n\nRead [core methodology](references/core-methodology.md), [risk scoring](references/risk-scoring.md), and [output format](references/Output Format.txt). Read only the relevant additional material:\n\n- [Specialised hazards](references/specialised-hazards.md) for chemical, biological, radiation, lifecycle, or exposure-route issues.\n- [Human and organisational factors](references/human-organisational-factors.md) when workload, competence, communication, supervision, fatigue, or organisational conditions may affect risk.\n- [Control selection](references/control-selection.md) when proposing additional controls.\n- Appendices A-D for hazard, control, activity, and consequence prompts.\n\nUser-supplied methodology and scoring thresholds take precedence unless they conflict with safety, law, or the current request; flag conflicts.\n\n## Assessment rules\n\n- Work at task or sub-task level. Use one row per meaningful hazard-consequence pathway.\n- Record only existing controls represented as currently implemented and functioning.\n- Score current risk after considering those existing controls.\n- Recommend additional controls in hierarchy order and identify owner, target date/status, and effectiveness measure.\n- Do not lower severity merely because administrative controls or PPE are proposed unless the credible consequence genuinely changes.\n- Residual scores based on unimplemented controls are **projected**, not verified. Confirm them only after implementation evidence and effectiveness checks.\n- Apply risk bands only when an authoritative organisational scheme is supplied. Otherwise report S, L, and RPN without inventing Low/Medium/High thresholds.\n\nEnd with site-validation and management-approval notes. Suggest natural-language next steps rather than command keywords.\n"
}