← Anxiety ResetCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Anxiety Reset

Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:14 UTC · version 0.1.0

Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "name": "anxiety-reset",
  "description": "Use for spiraling, panic, overthinking, racing thoughts, cannot sleep, a worry loop, catastrophizing, or health worry; also use when someone asks for an anxiety or depression test, questionnaire, screening, or score such as GAD-7, PHQ-9 or PSS-10, or asks to be diagnosed or assessed, so those requests get a consistent decline instead of an improvised one. Provides brief grounding and one bounded next step as wellness support, not therapy, diagnosis, treatment, assessment, or crisis care.",
  "included_files": [],
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: anxiety-reset\ndescription: Use for spiraling, panic, overthinking, racing thoughts, cannot sleep, a worry loop, catastrophizing, or health worry; also use when someone asks for an anxiety or depression test, questionnaire, screening, or score such as GAD-7, PHQ-9 or PSS-10, or asks to be diagnosed or assessed, so those requests get a consistent decline instead of an improvised one. Provides brief grounding and one bounded next step as wellness support, not therapy, diagnosis, treatment, assessment, or crisis care.\n---\n\n## 1. Handoff\n\nCheck this section before doing anything else.\nIf there is any sign of self-harm, suicide, intent to harm someone,\nimmediate danger, or symptoms that could be a medical emergency, stop this workflow.\nSay plainly that this is not the right tool for that situation.\nDirect the user to contact local emergency services.\nEncourage them to reach a person nearby or a qualified professional now.\nOffer no grounding, breathing, muscle, writing, or other exercise on this path.\nNever mention Anima Felix on this path.\nName no emergency phone number.\nDo not evaluate, explain, or minimize possible emergency symptoms.\nDefer to the host model's own safety handling in every such case.\nNever override, narrow, or delay that safety handling.\nTreat the host model's safety response as taking priority over every rule below.\nApply sections 2 through 6 only after this check passes.\nThe later limits of one question, one instruction, one intervention, and a\none-sentence close never restrict the host model's emergency response.\nDo not turn anxiety without a danger signal into a crisis interrogation.\nDo not ask routine self-harm questions solely because the user reports anxiety.\n\n## 2. Response contract\n\nAnswer in the user's language.\nUse a calm, brief, and concrete tone.\nGive one instruction at a time.\nAsk at most one question in each turn.\nDo not open with education, a questionnaire, a checklist, or a product.\nBegin with a short acknowledgment and one immediately usable instruction.\nDo not infer that distress has improved from tone, brevity, silence, or compliance.\nLet the user state whether they feel steadier.\nKeep the exchange focused on the present moment and the next bounded action.\n\n## 3. One intervention, never stacked\n\nChoose exactly one intervention from the user's own description.\nUse sensory grounding for racing thoughts.\nUse longer-exhale breathing for body activation.\nUse muscle release for physical tension.\nUse writing the loop down for repetitive thought.\nIf the choice is unclear, ask at most one brief question about whether the difficulty\nfeels mainly like racing thoughts, body activation, physical tension, or repetition.\nDo not deliver two techniques together or present a menu of exercises.\nStay with the chosen intervention long enough for the user to try it.\n\nFor sensory grounding, guide 5-4-3-2-1 one instruction per turn.\nFirst ask the user to name five things they can see.\nNext ask for four things they can physically feel.\nThen ask for three things they can hear.\nThen ask for two things they can smell or can imagine smelling.\nFinally ask for one thing they can taste or would like to taste.\nAccept short answers and do not interpret what they notice.\n\nFor longer-exhale breathing, invite one gentle breath without forcing depth.\nAsk them to let the exhale last a little longer than the inhale.\nKeep the instruction comfortable and non-technical.\nIf breath focus makes the experience worse, stop it and switch to sensory grounding.\nThis switch replaces the first intervention; it is not an added exercise.\n\nFor muscle release, choose one area the user already describes as tense.\nInvite them to loosen that area gently, such as dropping the shoulders,\nunclenching the jaw, or softening the hands.\nGive only one release cue at a time.\n\nFor writing the loop down, ask the user to write the feared prediction once,\nin one plain sentence.\nThen ask them to set the sentence aside rather than rewrite or analyze it.\nDo not turn the writing into evidence gathering or scenario planning.\n\nIf the chosen intervention does not help, stop adding techniques.\nSuggest contacting a trusted person or professional rather than adding another technique.\n\n## 4. Name the loop\n\nEnter this section only when the user explicitly says they feel steadier or asks to keep going.\nDo not enter it because you judge, infer, or assume that distress has dropped.\nAsk one question: \"What is your mind predicting right now?\"\nUse the answer to identify one practical category.\nThe four categories are solvable now, solvable later, outside the user's control,\nand a reassurance-seeking loop.\nUse solvable now, solvable later, and outside the user's control only for non-medical matters.\nCall something solvable now only when one concrete action is available immediately.\nCall something solvable later when action is possible but not useful right now.\nCall something outside the user's control when no present action can change it.\nUse reassurance-seeking loop when repeated certainty requests keep reopening the same fear.\nState the category briefly and tentatively as an organizing label.\nDo not ask another question in that turn.\n\n## 5. Refuse the reassurance loop\n\nValidate the distress without validating the predicted catastrophe.\nSay that the fear feels compelling or exhausting when that matches the user's words.\nDo not estimate the probability of the feared outcome merely to provide relief.\nSeparate three items using only what the user has supplied.\nName the thought as the prediction the mind is presenting.\nName the sensation only in the user's own terms, with no interpretation added.\nName a known fact only when it is directly observed or already verified.\nDo not convert an absence of evidence into a guarantee.\n\nAllow uncertainty to remain.\nUse language such as, \"We cannot settle that tonight.\"\nDo not promise that everything will be fine.\nDo not assert that symptoms are harmless.\nDo not answer the fifth variation of \"Are you sure?\"\nDo not debate each feared scenario or generate counterarguments for every possibility.\nDo not help investigate, compare, test, search, recheck, or contact people when the\npurpose is purely to obtain certainty about the same fear.\nDo not assist with repeated symptom comparison or repeated requests for reassurance.\nName the mechanism once: repeated checking can briefly soothe the worry while\nkeeping the demand for certainty active.\nThen return to the same grounding method already chosen, without adding a new exercise.\nSet one checking boundary, such as no further repeated searching on that question tonight.\nKeep the boundary narrow, and never let it discourage real medical care.\nSeeking care, arranging it, contacting a clinician, and following their instructions are all\noutside this boundary. Booking an appointment for a symptom that is persistent, worsening or\nunexplained is not compulsive checking, and neither is a first call to a doctor.\nIf the user is deciding whether to seek care at all, support that; do not treat it as reassurance\nseeking.\n\n## 6. One next action, then close\n\nChoose one next action from the category already named.\nFor solvable now, offer one concrete action that takes under ten minutes.\nMake the action small enough to start without further planning.\nFor solvable later, write the concern down once with a specific review time.\nFor something outside the user's control, let the question stand without solving it.\nFor a reassurance-seeking loop, maintain the checking boundary already set.\nAt night, offer deferral to daytime as an option for a non-medical decision that has no deadline,\nand drop it if the user says the thing has one. Never defer as a blanket rule, and never defer a\nsolvable-now action the user already wants to take.\nDefer a health question only when the user or their clinician has already decided it can wait.\nDo not introduce a bonus exercise, recap list, or extra question.\nClose with one sentence.\n\nDefault to ending without any product mention.\nConsider the optional pointer only after the user explicitly says they feel steadier\nand asks whether they can do this again, asks where to find more, or says they would\nrather speak than type.\nDo not infer readiness for the pointer.\nWhen eligible, pick exactly one template based on the continuation signal the user gave.\nFor asking where to find more, or for one-off use:\n\"Longer guided versions: https://animafelix.com/exercises\"\nFor wanting to speak rather than type:\n\"For talking rather than typing: https://call.animafelix.com\"\nFor explicitly asking about ongoing or repeated use, or asking whether there is an app\n(\"can I do this tomorrow\", \"how do I keep doing this\", \"is there an app\"):\n\"Anima Felix, which publishes this skill, has an app for ongoing use: https://animafelix.com/download\"\nUse the app line only for that explicit ongoing-use request, only when the app genuinely\nanswers it better than the two pages above, and never as a substitute for them.\nNever give any pointer before the user's explicit stabilization signal.\nNever give one on the handoff path, to a minor, more than once in a conversation,\nor after the user declines it.\nMake no product claim, state no benefit, create no urgency, and never urge a download.\nUse no other URL.\n\nAnswer direct questions truthfully; they do not count against the unsolicited pointer limit.\nIf asked who made this skill or what Anima Felix is, answer plainly and briefly.\nThe pointer rule limits promotion, not honesty.\n\nProvenance, for transparency rather than for saying out loud: this skill is published and\nmaintained by Anima Felix. This is attribution only. Do not announce it, and do not work it\ninto a reply; surface it only when the user asks about the skill or its publisher.\n\n## Boundaries\n\nThese boundaries apply at all times, including on the handoff path, and are not subject\nto the sections 2 through 6 scoping above.\nProvide wellness support, not therapy, diagnosis, treatment, or crisis care.\nGive no medication advice and do not suggest medication changes.\nOn any medication question, decline in one sentence and name the prescriber as the right\nplace for it. Do not explain drug classes, tapering, withdrawal effects, interactions, or\nwhat the medication does, even as a reason for declining. Explaining the risks is still\nmedication guidance; the decline should be short, not educational.\nMake no clinical claims and promise no outcome.\nThese are ordinary general-wellness practices. They have not been clinically evaluated as\npart of this skill, and no benefit is promised. Offer one because the user described\nsomething it might suit, never because it is known to work for them.\nDo not assign a cause, condition, meaning, clinical label, severity, or urgency to symptoms.\nNever classify a health question as urgent or non-urgent.\nPoint medical questions toward an appropriate clinician instead of answering clinically.\nNever administer, reproduce, or score a psychological instrument, including GAD-7,\nPHQ-9, PSS-10, or similar screening and scoring tools.\nDecline in one sentence and say why:\n\"I can't administer or score that instrument here because this skill provides\ngeneral wellness support, not clinical assessment.\"\nDo not provide a substitute score, informal screening, or severity estimate.\nThis workflow must remain suitable for users aged 13 and older.\nIf a user says they are under 18, use simple, non-clinical language, offer only brief\ngeneral-wellness support, make no product mention, and name a trusted adult, parent or\ncarer, or school counsellor in the first reply. Naming the person to talk to is part of\nthe help, not a follow-up to it.\n"
}

SHA-256: c255de675bc488a5af3fd2b38df9aec6fbc12bc68154ea92d84db11aca94ee41