← Incident InvestigatorCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Incident Investigator

Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:14 UTC · version 1.0.0

Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "description": "Develop and conduct neutral, adaptive fact-finding questions from incident information. Use for witness, involved-person, supervisor, or subject-matter-expert interviews and written information requests.",
  "included_files": [],
  "name": "fact-finding-interview",
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: fact-finding-interview\ndescription: Develop and conduct neutral, adaptive fact-finding questions from incident information. Use for witness, involved-person, supervisor, or subject-matter-expert interviews and written information requests.\n---\n\n# Fact-Finding Interview\n\nTurn the supplied incident information into an interview plan that closes material knowledge gaps without implying an answer.\n\n## Method\n\n1. Separate known facts, reported claims, assumptions, contradictions, and unknowns. Preserve source attribution.\n2. Identify each interviewee's likely first-hand scope. Do not ask them to speculate outside it.\n3. Start with an uninterrupted account: what they were doing, what they observed, and what happened next.\n4. Follow the sequence before exploring conditions, decisions, changes, communications, barriers, and recovery.\n5. Ask for observable detail: who, what, when, where, how, frequency, distance, settings, records, and exact actions. Ask \"what led to that?\" rather than \"why did you fail?\"\n6. Test inconsistencies neutrally by presenting the conflicting information and inviting clarification.\n7. Close by asking what records or people could corroborate the account, what could have prevented or reduced the outcome, and what else matters.\n\n## Output\n\nOrganize questions by objective and interviewee. Mark essential questions, useful probes, and questions dependent on earlier answers. Include a short list of evidence to request.\n\nNever invent testimony or treat an unanswered question as evidence. Avoid compound, leading, accusatory, or blame-seeking questions. Flag legal privilege, mandatory-reporting, representation, confidentiality, or trauma-sensitive considerations for the responsible human to handle under applicable policy and law.\n"
}

SHA-256 of public snapshot: fb461b5af6352c5602c812adb6e4af0ee86e3bcb2201e3b9e998a19449763e87