← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "autonomy-stress-test",
"description": "Stress-test proposed autonomous CIO preparation against evidence changes, approval gaps and human-control failures. Use when the user needs autonomy stress test for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 136
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: autonomy-stress-test\ndescription: Stress-test proposed autonomous CIO preparation against evidence changes, approval gaps and human-control failures. Use when the user needs autonomy stress test for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Autonomy Stress Test\n\n## Mission\n\nFind where governed autonomy would fail before any action is treated as approval-ready.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept action ledgers, autonomy gates, decision packets, risk registers, approval notes, evidence gaps and policy constraints.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Identify proposed autonomous or semi-autonomous preparation steps.\n2. Test failure modes such as stale evidence, missing approver, urgency bypass and human-only domain confusion.\n3. Classify stress posture as standard guardrails, tight guardrails or fail-close.\n4. Define required safeguards before autonomy can increase.\n5. Keep the result as a decision-support artifact only.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Stress Score\n- Stress Posture\n- Stressors\n- Failure Modes\n- Required Safeguards\n- Human-Control Notes\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not authorize execution. Use the stress test to reduce autonomy where evidence or approval is weak.\n"
}SHA-256: 4f6d65d544fe3590d3a5b00e3c0ba84abb666183854f66bde219ceeb9008c949