← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "executive-dissent-synthesizer",
"description": "Synthesize constructive CFO, CISO, COO, Audit, architecture and customer dissent before decisions are approved. Use when the user needs executive dissent synthesizer for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 145
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: executive-dissent-synthesizer\ndescription: Synthesize constructive CFO, CISO, COO, Audit, architecture and customer dissent before decisions are approved. Use when the user needs executive dissent synthesizer for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Executive Dissent Synthesizer\n\n## Mission\n\nTurn likely executive objections into better decision design before the meeting.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept decision packets, board packs, steering notes, proposals, risk chains, evidence gaps, financial context, architecture context and customer impact notes.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Simulate constructive dissent from CFO, CISO, COO, Audit, Enterprise Architecture and customer perspectives.\n2. Identify weak-answer risks.\n3. Define what a strong answer requires.\n4. Convert dissent into evidence requests, decision conditions and safeguards.\n5. Keep objections concise and board-ready.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Dissent Count\n- Dissent Items\n- Weak Answer Risks\n- Strong Answer Requirements\n- Decision Conditions\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not manufacture certainty. Use dissent to strengthen decision quality, not to block decisions by default.\n"
}SHA-256: c5f8d281483529de814b87784672e4943de029e952912162204c0c54cccd51b4