← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "policy-as-code-readiness",
"description": "Assess which governance, approval, evidence and exception controls could become policy-as-code rules later. Use when the user needs policy as code readiness for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 140
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: policy-as-code-readiness\ndescription: Assess which governance, approval, evidence and exception controls could become policy-as-code rules later. Use when the user needs policy as code readiness for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Policy as Code Readiness\n\n## Mission\n\nIdentify governance rules that could become codified checks in a future autonomous operating layer.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept policies, controls, audit findings, approval rules, exception processes, action ledgers and decision packets.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Extract repeated governance rules and approval gates.\n2. Identify codifiable controls.\n3. Mark missing taxonomy, evidence source and workflow owner.\n4. Separate advisory checks from hard gates.\n5. Recommend next maturity step.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Readiness Level\n- Codifiable Controls\n- Advisory vs Hard Gates\n- Missing Inputs\n- Next Maturity Step\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not claim enforcement. This skill prepares readiness for future tooling only.\n"
}SHA-256: bdef98e4a2415e70e5aacafce9d07f98d46ba32790404c52fab360c624a6e31f