← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORYWHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS
Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin
Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1
Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.
First saved snapshot
No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.
Compare saved observations
Download comparison JSONFull technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
"name": "talent-criticality-radar",
"description": "Detect key-person, scarce-skill, overloaded-team and owner-capacity risks that can block enterprise decisions or execution. Use when the user needs talent criticality radar for CIO decision support.",
"included_files": [
{
"relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
"size_in_bytes": 140
}
],
"skill_md_contents": "---\nname: talent-criticality-radar\ndescription: Detect key-person, scarce-skill, overloaded-team and owner-capacity risks that can block enterprise decisions or execution. Use when the user needs talent criticality radar for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Talent Criticality Radar\n\n## Mission\n\nExpose hidden workforce bottlenecks that threaten delivery, controls, architecture or decision execution.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept project staffing, owner lists, meeting notes, resource plans, architecture assignments, support queues and risk registers.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Identify scarce roles, named owners, overloaded teams and single points of knowledge.\n2. Link talent risks to decisions, delivery, control and customer impact.\n3. Prioritize critical roles and owner gaps.\n4. Draft mitigations: backup owners, descope, funding, sequencing or knowledge capture.\n5. Recommend executive action.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Criticality Level\n- Talent Signals\n- Key-Person Risks\n- Delivery / Control Impact\n- Mitigations\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nDo not infer personal performance. Focus on role, capacity and system risk.\n"
}SHA-256: af9720297d2077d0e1d68635e19f0f93bfbc52c8a6d651c048f48ef2d7654478