← Aivana CIO Decision TwinCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Aivana CIO Decision Twin

Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:16 UTC · version 0.1.1

Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "name": "vendor-negotiation-brief",
  "description": "Prepare negotiation asks, fallback position and human-review needs from vendor delivery, cost, contract and recovery signals. Use when the user needs vendor negotiation brief for CIO decision support.",
  "included_files": [
    {
      "relative_path": "agents/openai.yaml",
      "size_in_bytes": 140
    }
  ],
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: vendor-negotiation-brief\ndescription: Prepare negotiation asks, fallback position and human-review needs from vendor delivery, cost, contract and recovery signals. Use when the user needs vendor negotiation brief for CIO decision support.\n---\n\n# Vendor Negotiation Brief\n\n## Mission\n\nPrepare leadership for vendor negotiation without pretending to execute commercial or legal action.\n\n## Inputs\n\nAccept vendor updates, contract excerpts, milestone slippage, cost signals, recovery plans, service issues and risk chains.\n\n## Workflow\n\n1. Identify vendor pressure and missed commitments.\n2. Draft negotiation asks.\n3. Define fallback position.\n4. Identify legal/commercial review needs.\n5. Recommend negotiation posture.\n\n## Output Format\n\n- Executive Summary\n- Negotiation Pressure\n- Vendor Signals\n- Negotiation Asks\n- Fallback Position\n- Human Review\n- Evidence & Assumptions\n\n## Guardrails\n\nCommercial and legal review are required before real negotiation or contract action.\n"
}

SHA-256: 1988bd26e794d1ddced0ca37dd9a99655de8e764d0a20e7ad97db59575c8f7d9