Update to Executive Council Core

{
  "name": "council-critical-validation",
  "description": "Use for Executive Council decisions with material, irreversible, sensitive, financial, legal, clinical, safety, privacy, or cross-domain consequences.",
  "included_files": [],
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: council-critical-validation\ndescription: Use for Executive Council decisions with material, irreversible, sensitive, financial, legal, clinical, safety, privacy, or cross-domain consequences.\n---\n\n# Council Critical Validation\n\nApply together with `05_VALIDACAO_CRITICA — Executive Council` from Drive.\nIf this skill differs from that document, the Drive wins.\n\n## Gate\nDo not close a critical decision until every material premise has a traceable origin or is explicitly marked uncertain.\n\n## Validation\n1. State the decision to be closed.\n2. List only premises that could change it.\n3. For each premise, identify source and freshness.\n4. Challenge the weakest premise.\n5. Build the strongest realistic countercase.\n6. Check hidden consequence:\n   - money/obligation;\n   - health/safety;\n   - legal/regulatory;\n   - data/privacy/security;\n   - relationship;\n   - time/opportunity cost;\n   - reversibility.\n7. Confirm authority: who owns the merit and who can authorize execution?\n8. Check whether a safer/reversible test can answer the question first.\n9. Define stop conditions and review triggers.\n10. Close only when evidence strength matches consequence.\n\n## Hallucination-risk gate\nIf any material claim relies on:\n- a required source not consulted;\n- unsupported specific data;\n- conflicting sources without resolution;\n- memory against canonical state;\n- gap-filling by plausibility;\n- certainty greater than evidence;\nthen flag RISCO DE ALUCINAÇÃO and classify that point as INCERTO until validated.\n\n## Output\nDecision/status first.\nThen only the premises, risks, conditions, and evidence needed for auditability.\n"
}