← Executive Council CoreCONTENT HISTORY

Update to Executive Council Core

Snapshot Sep 30, 2026 · 23:17 UTC · version 0.2.0

Collection source: not recorded for this historical snapshot.

WHAT CHANGED · RULE-BASED ANALYSIS

First saved snapshot

No earlier snapshot is available to establish a change.

Compare saved observations

Download comparison JSON
Full technical diff · 0 changed fields
Full snapshot data
{
  "name": "council-systematic-debugging",
  "description": "Use for bugs, broken automations, integration failures, unexpected behavior, performance problems, bad outputs, or repeated failed attempts in the Executive Council.",
  "included_files": [],
  "skill_md_contents": "---\nname: council-systematic-debugging\ndescription: Use for bugs, broken automations, integration failures, unexpected behavior, performance problems, bad outputs, or repeated failed attempts in the Executive Council.\n---\n\n# Council Systematic Debugging\n\nThe current Google Drive Source of Truth, domain rules, platform/system instructions, and Samuel's explicit current request override this skill.\n\n## Protocol\nPARAR → preserve last valid state → locate bottleneck → form one hypothesis → change only what tests it → test → verify.\n\n## Phase 1 — Reproduce and localize\n1. State the observed symptom without interpretation.\n2. Reproduce if possible.\n3. Read the full error, log, or output already available.\n4. Identify recent relevant changes.\n5. Map component boundaries.\n6. Find the first layer where expected input/output diverges.\n\n## Phase 2 — Hypothesis\nState one falsifiable hypothesis:\n\"I think X is failing because evidence Y; test Z distinguishes it.\"\n\nDo not stack speculative fixes.\n\n## Phase 3 — Minimal test\nChange the smallest reversible variable that discriminates the hypothesis.\nRecord the result.\nIf false, discard the hypothesis and use the new evidence.\n\n## Phase 4 — Correct\nFix the root cause, not the visible symptom.\nPreserve rollback when the change is persistent or material.\n\n## Phase 5 — Verify\nUse `council-verification-gate` before claiming success.\n\n## Three-failure gate\nAfter three materially different failed fixes:\n- stop adding patches;\n- question the architecture or assumed layer;\n- recover from the last valid state;\n- escalate only the exact architectural decision that now requires authority.\n\n## Prohibited\n- random command sequences;\n- blind reinstall/reset/restart as a reflex;\n- changing multiple variables when causal attribution matters;\n- discarding valid work and starting over merely because debugging became difficult.\n"
}

SHA-256: 6fe0a30e591f8215af110155d81d057134458b33f487318e415892eb1dc40a04